Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checkout ait cache 5 for AIT runs #2164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Checkout ait cache 5 for AIT runs #2164

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024

Conversation

jtduffy
Copy link
Contributor

@jtduffy jtduffy commented Dec 9, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.69%. Comparing base (4431da3) to head (2ffc757).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2164      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     70.74%   70.69%   -0.05%     
+ Complexity    10006    10002       -4     
============================================
  Files           842      842              
  Lines         40346    40348       +2     
  Branches       6115     6115              
============================================
- Hits          28542    28526      -16     
- Misses         9054     9072      +18     
  Partials       2750     2750              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jtduffy
Copy link
Contributor Author

jtduffy commented Dec 10, 2024

Merging - both failing Solr AITs are flaky

@jtduffy jtduffy merged commit df8fa53 into main Dec 10, 2024
109 of 111 checks passed
@jtduffy jtduffy deleted the checkout-ait-cache-5 branch December 10, 2024 12:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants