Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Jedis-5.0.0 Instrumentation Module #1969

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 3, 2024
Merged

Add Jedis-5.0.0 Instrumentation Module #1969

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

deleonenriqueta
Copy link
Contributor

@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta commented Jul 3, 2024

Resolves Issue #1475

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.61%. Comparing base (a418735) to head (3fa8221).
Report is 464 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1969      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     70.67%   70.61%   -0.06%     
- Complexity     9861     9873      +12     
============================================
  Files           826      829       +3     
  Lines         39792    39914     +122     
  Branches       6061     6077      +16     
============================================
+ Hits          28124    28187      +63     
- Misses         8946     8998      +52     
- Partials       2722     2729       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta changed the title Add Jedis-5.0.0 Instrumentation Add Jedis-5.0.0 Instrumentation Module Jul 3, 2024
@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta marked this pull request as ready for review July 3, 2024 23:29
}

verifyInstrumentation {
passes 'redis.clients:jedis:[5.0.0,6.0.0)'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not use

passesOnly 'redis.clients:jedis:[5.0.0,)

If it works for 6.0.0, then we won't have to change this. If it doesn't, the verify instrumentation will tell us about it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated!

@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta merged commit 9338ecc into main Aug 3, 2024
111 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants