Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Discrepancy between number of JVMs listed from JFR and JVMs page #1864

Closed
obenkenobi opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Discrepancy between number of JVMs listed from JFR and JVMs page #1864

obenkenobi opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@deleonenriqueta
Labels
3 Story Point Estimate

Comments

@obenkenobi
Copy link
Contributor

obenkenobi commented Apr 18, 2024 •
edited
Loading

When turning on JFR (i.e. realtime profiling) in the java agent for multiple apps, the number of JVMs listed is not the same.

It may be related to how in the JVM page we report the host name plus port while in JFR we report the host name and IP address.

How to possibly replicate it:

  1. Create a docker image with 2 java apps running on different ports running on the Java Agent and with the same configuration settings.
  2. Create multiple docker containers with the same image.
  3. Check the New Relic UI for discrepancies in the number of JVMs.
@obenkenobi obenkenobi converted this from a draft issue Apr 18, 2024
@workato-integration
Copy link

https://new-relic.atlassian.net/browse/NR-260487

@obenkenobi obenkenobi added bug Something isn't working as designed/intended estimate Issue needing estimation labels Apr 18, 2024
@kford-newrelic kford-newrelic added 3 Story Point Estimate and removed bug Something isn't working as designed/intended estimate Issue needing estimation labels Apr 18, 2024
@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta moved this from In Quarter to In Sprint in Java Engineering Board May 3, 2024
This was referenced Jun 4, 2024
Merged
Closed
Closed
Merged
@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta moved this from In Sprint to Needs Review in Java Engineering Board Jun 10, 2024
@deleonenriqueta
Copy link
Contributor

Resolved with PR 1928

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Review to Code Complete/Done in Java Engineering Board Jun 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@deleonenriqueta deleonenriqueta

Labels
3 Story Point Estimate
Projects
Java Engineering Board
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@obenkenobi @deleonenriqueta @kford-newrelic @kanderson250