-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Strange behaviour with generated >3 VLANs table for interfaces #17771
Comments
I can confirm that we see the same behaviour. |
If only
If But a solution seems is to add
See this commit: thordreier@ee1de42 |
Couldn't the link just go to the interface page and focus the VLAN table? I don't see why it has to go to the VLAN list + filter there. |
That was also the first implentation in #17662 - but it was decided to change it. |
@thordreier would you be open to have this issue assigned to you and open a PR since you seem to already have the fix? |
@jsenecal yeah, that's fine |
@thordreier assigned it to you. Thank you. |
@thordreier do you still intend to work on this issue? |
Sorry. I forgot about this issue. I've created the pull request now. |
Deployment Type
Self-hosted
Triage priority
N/A
NetBox Version
v4.1.4
Python Version
3.11
Steps to Reproduce
I'm seeing some weird behaviour with the new feature as implemented per #17655. I can't give exact guaranteed reproduction steps, because it might be something specific to my database that I haven't figured out yet, but basically:
/ipam/vlans/?interface_id=<ID>
).Expected Behavior
Tagged VLANs for that interface are shown correctly.
Observed Behavior
What I am seeing is some of the tagged VLANs being listed multiple times (and the untagged VLAN showing up as well, which I guess is to be expected). I've tried to reproduce it with new VLANs created after the update to 4.1.4 and it seems to work as expected with those (some "older" VLANs are also only showing up once, however, so it might not be related to that at all), but when I attach a certain existing VLAN as tagged to the interface it results in multiple redundant rows again.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: