Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Assigned network IP possible via bulk edit #15220

Closed
xee8ai opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #15319
Closed

Assigned network IP possible via bulk edit #15220

xee8ai opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #15319
Assignees
@jeremystretch
Labels
severity: medium Results in substantial degraded or broken functionality for specfic workflows status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@xee8ai
Copy link
Contributor

xee8ai commented Feb 21, 2024

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v3.7.2

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create multiple IP addresses in 192.168.0.0/24, including 192.168.0.128/24 assigned to an interface
  2. Mark the IP addresses in the overview and click „Edit selected“
  3. Set „Mask length“ to 25 and click „Apply“

Expected Behavior

I would expect the same behavior like creating 192.168.0.128/25 directly. This is not possible because it is a network address. NetBox complains about that with a warning popup and doesn't save the IP address.

Observed Behavior

There now is a IP address 192.168.0.128/25

screenshot_ip_addresses
@xee8ai xee8ai added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Feb 21, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation severity: medium Results in substantial degraded or broken functionality for specfic workflows labels Feb 29, 2024
@jeremystretch jeremystretch self-assigned this Feb 29, 2024
jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2024
@jeremystretch
Fixes #15220: Move IP mask validation logic from form to model
e9ce737
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Feb 29, 2024
Merged
jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2024
@jeremystretch
Fixes #15220: Move IP mask validation logic from form to model
bdcf4c4
jeremystretch added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2024
@jeremystretch
Changelog for #15220, #15232, #15241, #15243, #15316
de62280
@jeremystretch jeremystretch mentioned this issue Mar 13, 2024
Merged
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@jeremystretch jeremystretch

Labels
severity: medium Results in substantial degraded or broken functionality for specfic workflows status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fixes #15220: Move IP mask validation logic from form to model netbox-community/netbox
2 participants
@xee8ai @jeremystretch