docs(authentication) URL and type fix #552
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update exception filter docs link and fix return type in example
kamilmysliwiec
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2019
johnbiundo
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@evdhiggins Thanks for this!
The sample code matches this change (returning promise), so this brings the docs in alignment with the sample.
@kamilmysliwiec - good to go.
duard
pushed a commit
to duard/docs.nestjs.com
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 4, 2023
docs(authentication): URL and type fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update the link to the exception filters docs page and fix return type in one of the examples.
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
N/A
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
N/A
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information