Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: get_fee_rate_statics compatibility #3746

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 9, 2022

Conversation

zhangsoledad
Copy link
Member

What problem does this PR solve?

Due to the inertia of the previous fee_rate usage, change the unit returned by get_fee_rate_statics to shannons per kilo-weight

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

Title Only: Include only the PR title in the release note.

@zhangsoledad zhangsoledad requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2022 08:49
@zhangsoledad zhangsoledad requested review from quake and removed request for a team December 8, 2022 08:49
@zhangsoledad zhangsoledad force-pushed the zhangsoledad/kilo-weight branch from 2601e28 to ce12052 Compare December 8, 2022 10:53
@quake
Copy link
Member

quake commented Dec 8, 2022

please follow rpc convention to use the hex format for u64 json type.

@zhangsoledad zhangsoledad force-pushed the zhangsoledad/kilo-weight branch from ce12052 to a2db812 Compare December 8, 2022 15:01
@zhangsoledad
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2022
3745: [backport] fix(light-client): according to the rfc change (nervosnetwork/rfcs#397) r=zhangsoledad a=yangby-cryptape

### What problem does this PR solve?

Backport #3744.

### Check List

Tests

- Unit test
- Integration test
- Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
- No code ci-runs-only: [ quick_checks,linters ]

### Release note

```release-note
Title Only: Include only the PR title in the release note.
```

3747: [backport] fix: get_fee_rate_statics compatibility  r=zhangsoledad a=zhangsoledad

<!--
Thank you for contributing to nervosnetwork/ckb!

If you haven't already, please read [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/nervosnetwork/ckb/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md) document.

If you're unsure about anything, just ask; somebody should be along to answer within a day or two.

PR Title Format:
1. module [, module2, module3]: what's changed
2. *: what's changed
-->

### What problem does this PR solve?

backport #3746




### Check List <!--REMOVE the items that are not applicable-->

Tests <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

- Unit test
- Integration test


### Release note <!-- Choose from None, Title Only and Note. Bugfixes or new features need a release note. -->

```release-note
Title Only: Include only the PR title in the release note.
```



Co-authored-by: Boyu Yang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: zhangsoledad <[email protected]>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Dec 9, 2022

@bors bors bot merged commit 1b4b5f4 into nervosnetwork:develop Dec 9, 2022
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2022
3747: [backport] fix: get_fee_rate_statics compatibility  r=zhangsoledad a=zhangsoledad

<!--
Thank you for contributing to nervosnetwork/ckb!

If you haven't already, please read [CONTRIBUTING](https://github.com/nervosnetwork/ckb/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md) document.

If you're unsure about anything, just ask; somebody should be along to answer within a day or two.

PR Title Format:
1. module [, module2, module3]: what's changed
2. *: what's changed
-->

### What problem does this PR solve?

backport #3746




### Check List <!--REMOVE the items that are not applicable-->

Tests <!-- At least one of them must be included. -->

- Unit test
- Integration test


### Release note <!-- Choose from None, Title Only and Note. Bugfixes or new features need a release note. -->

```release-note
Title Only: Include only the PR title in the release note.
```



Co-authored-by: zhangsoledad <[email protected]>
@doitian doitian mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2022
@doitian doitian mentioned this pull request Jan 12, 2023
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants