-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NEP: NeoContract Manifest #114
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Such a fine piece of art! Well written and described.
Thanks for the consideration and inclusion as author,
Thanks for my inclusion @bettybao1209 ! I think that the document describe well the manifest format. Good work! |
I'm honored for the inclusion, thanks! |
Merge? |
It should be merged after #119. |
How will now the user that NEP3 and NEP6 it's obsolete? we should add a line for redirect to the new one |
I was discussing With devhawk in this issue the need of specifying the file name suffix What I observe is that compilers give the option to developers to specify any kind of file name they want (which is not bad!), but then, at least the default output filename name should be set with a standardized suffix (i.e., This gains even more importance to developer experience if we consider that key tools in our community, like https://github.com/ngdenterprise/neo3-visual-tracker, relies on discovering contracts to be deployed based on the manifest filename. I suggest adding, somewhere in this NEP:
or something in this direction. |
Does anyone have any comments or suggestions? @neo-project/everyone |
close #110