Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
3s consensus - With consensus time included into consensus intervals. #3622
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
3s consensus - With consensus time included into consensus intervals. #3622
Changes from 31 commits
b5fd4ec
91c4bd2
9ba85d8
a095496
3329c54
774471a
739beaf
af42801
9d677c5
cd91440
26b1e58
3b52a3c
f016575
1570990
6fe0abf
19d0850
18cd445
169a7e7
8b47891
45eb20d
ded7002
d9c635c
6bc2770
1c2dcd1
6def9c8
3664890
fde030c
ae6594c
2a39868
593e573
430f346
89891b7
e81cd4c
59b1d17
7ea21f1
6e5686c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this can be dropped now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is the major change to this pr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should be in another PR and not here, if that is the case.
And for your notice, as I said in our meetings, this configuration has been tested in the past.
I think that you need more experimental tests before publishing things to quick and even writing new standards (that are not even necessary).
I am not saying that the change is terrible, @Jim8y, but there are some consequences, I think that you did not analyse the entire scenario before pushing this and creating standards with it.
I will surely be against this change here in this PR for a series of reasons.
Try this in a decentralized scenario or inserting delays (you can deal with that on docker) or create on AWS/AZURE in different locations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lots have changed in code since then. Would that affect anything like this? if so, we have to run these tests again to ensure its trueful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have setup a real testnet to carry out stress test and stability test for weeks. The network works fine and no issue. As you said should be in another pr thing, all changes in this pr now is for the service of and only serve the 3-seconds consensus, it is meaningless to add any of the prs and test any of the prs that only contain part of the changes in this pr. Casue non of the code in this pr means a thing without rest part.
We encourage small prs for the intention of easier review and test, its not like everything must be as small as possible.
If there is no review issue and no real logic problem, we should not split a complete and already tested pr.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right @cschuchardt88 , I was also saying that in my last message. Let's see