Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(runtime): use correct random value for random seed #3096

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 11, 2020

Conversation

bowenwang1996
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently we use action hash for the random seed, which is not random at all.

Test plan

  • upgradable.py.

@gitpod-io
Copy link

gitpod-io bot commented Aug 7, 2020

@frol frol requested a review from abacabadabacaba August 7, 2020 07:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@evgenykuzyakov evgenykuzyakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not pass current PROTOCOL_VERSION to all tests? Is it not available?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3096 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3096   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.89%   87.89%           
=======================================
  Files         212      212           
  Lines       42963    42963           
=======================================
  Hits        37762    37762           
  Misses       5201     5201           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ee16b5...27c0a40. Read the comment docs.

@bowenwang1996 bowenwang1996 merged commit 2124a14 into master Aug 11, 2020
@bowenwang1996 bowenwang1996 deleted the fix-random-value branch August 11, 2020 00:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants