[Innspill til komponent]: <ExpansionCard />

[karl-run]

Tilbakemelding

Jeg vil kunne provide a11y label via aria-labelledby isteden for å bli tvunget til å bruke aria-label.

Eksempel:

const headerId = `minUnikeId-${sykmeldingsId}`

<ExpansionCard aria-labelledby={headerId}>
    <ExpansionCard.Header id={headerId}>
        En tittel

Dagens props krever at aria-label er satt:

[KenAJoh]

Ser ut som det er godkjent syntax, så ser ikke noe i veien for det
@mortentollefsen Vet du om noen ulemper med aria-labelledby vs aria-label for section-elementer?

[mortentollefsen]

Aria-labelledby skal fungere like bra. Mvh: Morten 90 89 93 05 Fra: Ken ***@***.***> Sendt: fredag 21. april 2023 14:00 Til: navikt/aksel ***@***.***> Kopi: Tollefsen, Morten ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Emne: Re: [navikt/aksel] [Innspill til komponent]: <ExpansionCard /> (Issue #1931) Ser ut som det er godkjent syntax, så ser ikke noe i veien for det<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.scottohara.me/blog/2021/07/16/section.html__;!!M12l6qNq_w!p5TpeEd2lPDTsH7VqXbb5U0AZ-hRDphPx7m1pCBqlietP-04XGM5jZkArwrUUaOTxOOIwHhK8UDiEabUScw8Rxbqb7Sn3Q$> @mortentollefsen<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/mortentollefsen__;!!M12l6qNq_w!p5TpeEd2lPDTsH7VqXbb5U0AZ-hRDphPx7m1pCBqlietP-04XGM5jZkArwrUUaOTxOOIwHhK8UDiEabUScw8RxZjzer8pw$> Vet du om noen ulemper med aria-labelledby vs aria-label for section-elementer? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/navikt/aksel/issues/1931*issuecomment-1517715121__;Iw!!M12l6qNq_w!p5TpeEd2lPDTsH7VqXbb5U0AZ-hRDphPx7m1pCBqlietP-04XGM5jZkArwrUUaOTxOOIwHhK8UDiEabUScw8Rxa0Yr81IA$>, or unsubscribe<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWAH7RV5CIXJPFZS4MRRKYLXCJZFHANCNFSM6AAAAAAXGYVJTI__;!!M12l6qNq_w!p5TpeEd2lPDTsH7VqXbb5U0AZ-hRDphPx7m1pCBqlietP-04XGM5jZkArwrUUaOTxOOIwHhK8UDiEabUScw8RxbpR0v76w$>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>