Fix Cloudvision naming conflict #292
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This change corrects documentation and configuration for Cloudvision to reflect the command name. In addition this removes remaining references to RQ and adds the Integration CODEOWNERS.
smk4664
requested review from
glennmatthews,
jvanderaa and
whitej6
as code owners
jvanderaa
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
|
@smk4664 would this be a breaking change? |
I would say no, because enable_aristacv does absolutely nothing. The alternative is renaming the command to |
qduk
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change corrects documentation and configuration for Cloudvision to reflect the command name.
In addition this removes remaining references to RQ and adds the Integration CODEOWNERS.