Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle nodata or other ignore values in raster data sets #58

Open
hannah-rae opened this issue Aug 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Handle nodata or other ignore values in raster data sets #58

hannah-rae opened this issue Aug 11, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hannah-rae
Copy link
Contributor

Rasters often have nodata values that should be ignored in analysis (e.g., edges missing data due to registration). These pixels should be given a specific sentinel value (e.g., -9999) instead of being scored.

@hannah-rae hannah-rae self-assigned this Aug 11, 2021
bdubayah added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2021
@hannah-rae
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bdubayah Have you made this change for the raster pixel loader too? Are you planning to PR/merge or are you still making changes?

@bdubayah
Copy link
Contributor

Still need to do it for raster pixels. I think we also need to decide the merge strategy for overlapping patches - whether to stick with mean or do max instead. I'm going to try with max for the vtfs experiment and see how it works out.

bdubayah added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants