Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip convar tests if not implemented #1404

Closed
jphickey opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1405
Closed

Skip convar tests if not implemented #1404

jphickey opened this issue Aug 18, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1405
Assignees
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the bug
If the "no-condvar" implementation is used, all calls will return OS_ERR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED. This is expected/OK. But, the "condvar-test" program does not recognize this, and it reports many failures.

To Reproduce
Run "condvar-test" when using the "no-condvar" implementation

Expected behavior
Should just report that the functionality is not implemented, and skip the tests. Network (and other optional functionality) works this way.

System observed on:
VxWorks 6.9

Reporter Info
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.

@jphickey jphickey self-assigned this Aug 18, 2023
@jphickey jphickey added the bug label Aug 18, 2023
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
This reports that the functionality is not implemented and reports it as
an MIR result, instead of having most/all of the tests fail.
jphickey added a commit to jphickey/osal that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
This reports that the functionality is not implemented and reports it as
an MIR result, instead of having most/all of the tests fail.
dzbaker added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
Fix #1404, skip condvar tests if not implemented
@chillfig chillfig added this to the Equuleus milestone Aug 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants