You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If a user wants to add additional error checking within the header fields, such as a CRC, there is currently no easy way to validate the value as part of the receive buffer process.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a hook to validate the message before returning from SB.
Additional context
This can be a no-op in the default build, as only the CMDs have a (weak) checksum, and that was never really enforced/checked in CFS anyway. So for backward compatibility the implementation should be permissive. But if the user has customized MSG with additional fields and logic, they could implement more validation using this hook.
Requester Info
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If a user wants to add additional error checking within the header fields, such as a CRC, there is currently no easy way to validate the value as part of the receive buffer process.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a hook to validate the message before returning from SB.
Additional context
This can be a no-op in the default build, as only the CMDs have a (weak) checksum, and that was never really enforced/checked in CFS anyway. So for backward compatibility the implementation should be permissive. But if the user has customized MSG with additional fields and logic, they could implement more validation using this hook.
Requester Info
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: