-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
enh: Add .rows(named=False)
support for pyarrow
#1155
Conversation
Slow support is better than no support
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @schloerke , thanks for the PR! I tend to agree with the statement:
I'm in the camp of slow support is better than no support.
Not sure about Marco's opinion though.
Regarding the failing CI, you should remove the part of the tests that explicitly fails/raises for pyarrow case
@FBruzzesi Fixed 😄 Narwhal's testing, pre-commit, and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks both! i'm just at a company retreat but i'll try to merge / release tomorrow |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks @schloerke and @FBruzzesi for reviewing!
I'm in the camp of slow support is better than no support.
If there ever comes a time that pyarrow supports retrieving row values more natively, then this code can be updated.
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Related issues
Checklist
If you have comments or can explain your changes, please do so below.
posit-dev/py-shiny uses
.rows(named=False)
to retrieve the values