For this repo, link contributions to documentation contribution guide

[vreuter]

Right now, the "contributing" section of the main README links to the contribution guide for the main project rather than for the documentation itself. This updates the link to point to the contribution guide for the napari documentation.

Partially adresses: #265

[psobolewskiPhD]

Thanks for catching that!
Small tweak, we want the contributing stuff to point to the most current, dev, version of the docs, rather than stable. At some point this will magically be the case, but for now...

[psobolewskiPhD]

I updated your OP to link to this issue:
#265

This PR partially addresses it, but doesn't quite close -- unless we think we don't need a summary of the docs contribution stuff in the README...

[vreuter]

I updated your OP to link to this issue: #265

This PR partially addresses it, but doesn't quite close -- unless we think we don't need a summary of the docs contribution stuff in the README...

Thanks for linking this @psobolewskiPhD , especially as I'm just learning about napari recently and haven't looked around yet at the tickets. I'm happy to update this but I want to confirm I understand what you'd like added...

Do you mean the main README should include a (quite) brief-ened (for lack of a better word) version of the guide to contributing to the docs, as well as a quick installation, i.e. what you reference here:

Additionally, I think it would be helpful to have the install and local make docs instructions as brief bullet points in the README for the advanced user to get going quickly.

?

If so, I'm happy to take a crack at that in this PR :)

[psobolewskiPhD]

Do you mean the main README should include a (quite) brief-ened (for lack of a better word) version of the guide to contributing to the docs, as well as a quick installation, i.e. what you reference here:

Yea, exactly. If you want to go for that and close that issue, awesome.
Otherwise we can merge this -- it's good to go and un-controvertial -- and you can make a new PR for that, which may require more tweaking. Up to you!

I think I would lean to the 2nd approach, just to keep things simple.

[vreuter]

I think I would lean to the 2nd approach, just to keep things simple.

Agreed @psobolewskiPhD , I can address #265 in a separate PR :)

[psobolewskiPhD]

Awesome! Thanks for your efforts!
I'll try to remember to merge this tomorrow, just in case there is some additional discussion 👀
If I don't, please feel free to ping me with a reminder.
Also, in case you're interested feel free to reach out on napari.zulipchat.com
Or come to a community meeting: https://napari.org/stable/community/meeting_schedule.html

[lucyleeow]

LGTM, thanks!

[GenevieveBuckley]

Thank you @vreuter!