Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix string relocation handler #3073

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

josesimoes
Copy link
Member

@josesimoes josesimoes commented Jan 22, 2025

Description

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dev Containers (changes related with Dev Containers, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies/declarations (update dependencies or assembly declarations and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved memory management and garbage collection efficiency for string handling.
    • Refined relocation process for specific string components.

@josesimoes josesimoes added the Area: Common libs Everything related with common libraries label Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Relocate_String method in the CLR_RT_HeapBlock.cpp file, specifically updating how string data is relocated during garbage collection. The changes refine the relocation process by explicitly relocating specific components of the m_data structure (m_text and conditionally m_assm) instead of relocating the entire structure. This modification targets memory management precision during the garbage collection process.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/CLR/Core/CLR_RT_HeapBlock.cpp Updated Relocate_String method to relocate specific components of m_data instead of the entire structure

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix asserts #3074: This PR modifies the CLR_RT_HeapCluster class and introduces changes to the ValidateBlock method, which is related to memory management, similar to the changes made in the Relocate_String method of the main PR.
  • Fix usage of uintptr_t accross GC and HeapCluster classes #3076: This PR enhances the usage of uintptr_t across the GC and HeapCluster classes, which is relevant to the memory management improvements seen in the main PR's changes to the CLR_RT_GarbageCollector class.
  • Fix assert in GC::Heap_Compact #3080: This PR focuses on fixing assertions in the Heap_Compact method, which is part of the garbage collection process, aligning with the memory management improvements in the main PR.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bbe2f2 and 6d69d7e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/CLR/Core/CLR_RT_HeapBlock.cpp (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/CLR/Core/CLR_RT_HeapBlock.cpp
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: nf-interpreter (Nightly build) (Build_STM32_targets ST_NUCLEO64_F091RC)
  • GitHub Check: nf-interpreter (Nightly build) (Build_STM32_targets ORGPAL_PALX)
  • GitHub Check: nf-interpreter (Nightly build) (Build_STM32_targets ORGPAL_PALTHREE)
  • GitHub Check: nf-interpreter (Check_Code_Style)
  • GitHub Check: nf-interpreter (Nightly build) (Check_Build_Options)
  • GitHub Check: nf-interpreter (Check_Build_Options)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@josesimoes josesimoes force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from eeab92b to 1da6e94 Compare January 30, 2025 11:47
- Now relocating correct heap block parts.
- Partially reverts nanoframework#2818.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Common libs Everything related with common libraries Type: bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants