Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Rename blockprocessor to block_processor for consistency #4812

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 30, 2024
Merged

Rename blockprocessor to block_processor for consistency #4812

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

pwojcikdev
Copy link
Contributor

Class name is block_processor but the file name and certain enumerations used blockprocessor name.

@gr0vity-dev-bot
Copy link

gr0vity-dev-bot commented Dec 30, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Test Results for Commit 8ea3b2b

Pull Request 4812: Results
Overall Status: ✅

Test Case Results

  • ✅ 5n4pr_conf_10k_bintree: PASS (Duration: 119s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_conf_10k_change: PASS (Duration: 143s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_conf_change_dependant: PASS (Duration: 135s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_conf_change_independant: PASS (Duration: 139s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_conf_send_dependant: PASS (Duration: 119s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_conf_send_independant: PASS (Duration: 119s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_rocks_10k_bintree: PASS (Duration: 108s)
  • ✅ 5n4pr_rocks_10k_change: PASS (Duration: 154s)

Last updated: 2024-12-30 09:40:28 UTC

@pwojcikdev pwojcikdev merged commit 6201aab into nanocurrency:develop Dec 30, 2024
28 checks passed
@pwojcikdev pwojcikdev deleted the blockprocessor-renaming branch December 30, 2024 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@clemahieu clemahieu clemahieu approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@pwojcikdev @gr0vity-dev-bot @clemahieu