Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update UI block status #1510

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2018
Merged

Update UI block status #1510

merged 2 commits into from
Dec 28, 2018

Conversation

argakiig
Copy link
Contributor

@argakiig argakiig commented Dec 28, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Sorted Blocks: xxxxx Unsorted: xxxxxx
image
fixes #1245

Fixes #1245
ae45fad 
Sorted Blocks: xxxxx Unsorted: xxxxxx
@argakiig argakiig changed the title Fixes #1245 Update UI block status Dec 28, 2018
@argakiig argakiig added this to the V18.0 milestone Dec 28, 2018
@argakiig argakiig self-assigned this Dec 28, 2018
@argakiig argakiig requested a review from cryptocode December 28, 2018 19:01
@argakiig
Copy link
Contributor Author

image

cryptocode
cryptocode approved these changes Dec 28, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@cryptocode cryptocode left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rkeene rkeene merged commit d47c54e into nanocurrency:master Dec 28, 2018
@argakiig argakiig mentioned this pull request Dec 31, 2018
Merged
zhyatt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2019
@argakiig @zhyatt
Fix tests broken with #1510 (#1524)
7335442
@argakiig argakiig deleted the fix/blockcount_status branch January 16, 2019 16:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@cryptocode cryptocode cryptocode approved these changes

Assignees

@argakiig argakiig

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
V18.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

please make the status make sense for the average technical user
3 participants
@argakiig @cryptocode @rkeene