Wrap remaining ES6 classes in GObject.registerClass().

[ettavolt]

Override Gio.Settings._init instead of constructor.
Closes #77.

[ettavolt]

Maybe I need to change formatting a bit?

[ViggoGaming]

hmm idk, is that a fix? IT still dosen't work for me.

[ebeem]

seems like the GObject issue was fixed, but there is another issue with the way settings file gets the schema. Thanks for your contribution.

[ettavolt]

Do you mean "can't use 'in' operator to check for presence of 'schema' in 'org.gnome.shell…"? With my gjs 1.58.2, I had to change from 'constructor' to 'init' in Settings class.

[ebeem]

@ettavolt I am trying your branch, usually, I think extension.js should throw this exception in line 10
in your branch, extensions.js seems to be ok, but prefs.js throws the exception

TypeError: cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'schema' in 'org.gnome.shell....'

TypeError: cannot use 'in' operator to search for 'schema' in 'org.gnome.shell....'

Stack trace:
  _init/_init/<@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/overrides/Gio.js:539:45
  _init@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/overrides/Gio.js:539:17
  buildPrefsWidget@/home/ebeem/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions/[email protected]/prefs.js:144:19
  _showPrefs@resource:///org/gnome/shell/extensionPrefs/main.js:57:22
  vfunc_command_line@resource:///org/gnome/shell/extensionPrefs/main.js:351:23
  main@resource:///org/gnome/shell/extensionPrefs/main.js:707:5
  @<main>:1:43
  

let settings = new Settings(WsMatrix.metadata['settings-schema']);

[ebeem]

@ViggoGaming can you please show the error that you got?

[ettavolt]

What? Same code, but works in one place and not another?
However, judging by stacktrace it didn't go through overridden _init in WsMa's Settings.
Maybe your session wasn't entirely restarted, only shell was reloaded?

[ebeem]

my bad, seems like not all files were pulled from your branch for some reason.
it's actually working properly. Thanks!

[mzur]

Thanks, this looks just like the fix suggested here. Can you please revert the indentation to what it was before? The actual code changes are fine.

[ettavolt]

Now it's

var X = GO.rC(
class X extends GODescendant {
…
});

And GitHub shows less changes.

[mzur]

Thanks!