[ISSUE #698]🚀Support UpdateConsumerOffset(15) request⚡️ #700
Conversation
WalkthroughThe code changes focus on improving RocketMQ's handling of consumer offsets. Key modifications include the direct storage of Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant BrokerRuntime
participant ConsumerOffsetManager
participant ConsumerManageProcessor
Client->>BrokerRuntime: Update Consumer Offset Request
BrokerRuntime->>ConsumerOffsetManager: Handle Offset (Init)
ConsumerOffsetManager-->>BrokerRuntime: Offset Managed
BrokerRuntime->>ConsumerManageProcessor: Process New Offset Information
ConsumerManageProcessor->>ConsumerOffsetManager: Update Offset for Client
ConsumerOffsetManager-->>ConsumerManageProcessor: Offset Updated
ConsumerManageProcessor-->>Client: Offset Update Confirmation
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (4 hunks)
- rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs (4 hunks)
- rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs (4 hunks)
- rocketmq-broker/src/subscription/manager/subscription_group_manager.rs (1 hunks)
- rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs (1 hunks)
- rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (2 hunks)
- rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs (1 hunks)
- rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1 hunks)
- rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to errors (1)
- rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs (no review received)
Additional comments not posted (8)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs (1)
28-28: New module addition for consumer offset updates.Ensure that the new
update_consumer_offset_headermodule is properly integrated and utilized where necessary.Verification successful
New module addition for consumer offset updates.
The newupdate_consumer_offset_headermodule is properly integrated and utilized in the codebase.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header.rs: Module definition.rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs: Module usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new module is being used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the module usage. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type rust $'update_consumer_offset_header'Length of output: 292
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs (1)
101-101: Good practice to mark unused variables.Changing
topic_configto_topic_configis a good practice in Rust to indicate that the variable is not used, which avoids compiler warnings.rocketmq-broker/src/subscription/manager/subscription_group_manager.rs (1)
104-112: New method for checking subscription group existence.The addition of
contains_subscription_groupis crucial for dynamic subscription group management. Ensure this method is integrated and used correctly in the context of subscription group checks.Verification successful
Method
contains_subscription_groupintegrated correctly.The method
contains_subscription_groupis used inrocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsto check for the existence of a subscription group and handle cases where the group does not exist. This confirms its proper integration and usage in the codebase.
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new method is used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type rust $'contains_subscription_group'Length of output: 291
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the context of the method usage in the specified file. # Extract 10 lines before and after the usage of `contains_subscription_group` in the file. rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'contains_subscription_group' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsLength of output: 922
rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs (1)
38-65: Enhancements in consumer offset management.The new methods and modifications in
ConsumerOffsetManagerenhance the management of consumer offsets. It's important to ensure that these changes are thoroughly tested, especially the newcommit_offsetandhas_offset_resetmethods.Also applies to: 67-122, 157-162, 189-195
Verification successful
The script output shows multiple occurrences of
commit_offsetandhas_offset_resetin the codebase. However, we need to verify that these occurrences are related to theConsumerOffsetManagermethods. Let's check the context of these occurrences to ensure they are correctly implemented and used.
Enhancements in consumer offset management.
The
commit_offsetandhas_offset_resetmethods inConsumerOffsetManagerare correctly implemented and utilized in the codebase. Specifically, their usage inrocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsconfirms their integration.
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsrocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new methods are used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: At least one occurrence for each method. rg --type rust $'commit_offset|has_offset_reset'Length of output: 4130
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the context of commit_offset and has_offset_reset methods to ensure they are used in relation to ConsumerOffsetManager # Search for the commit_offset method definition in ConsumerOffsetManager rg --type rust 'pub fn commit_offset' -A 10 rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs # Search for the has_offset_reset method definition in ConsumerOffsetManager rg --type rust 'pub fn has_offset_reset' -A 10 rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs # Check where commit_offset is used in the codebase to ensure it's from ConsumerOffsetManager rg 'commit_offset' -A 3 # Check where has_offset_reset is used in the codebase to ensure it's from ConsumerOffsetManager rg 'has_offset_reset' -A 3Length of output: 13514
rocketmq-common/src/common/broker/broker_config.rs (1)
Line range hint
155-219: New configuration field for consumer offset updates.The addition of
consumer_offset_update_version_stepinBrokerConfigallows for more controlled updates of consumer offsets. Verify that this new field is being used appropriately in the system configuration and during runtime operations.Verification successful
New configuration field for consumer offset updates has been verified.
The field
consumer_offset_update_version_stepis used appropriately in theconsumer_offset_manager.rsfile to control the update intervals of the data version.
rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rs: The field is used in a conditional statement to control the frequency of data version updates.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new configuration field is being used in the codebase. # Test: Search for the field usage. Expect: At least one occurrence. rg --type rust $'consumer_offset_update_version_step'Length of output: 389
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Display the context around the usage of consumer_offset_update_version_step in consumer_offset_manager.rs # Display the relevant lines of code around its usage in consumer_offset_manager.rs rg --context 10 'consumer_offset_update_version_step' rocketmq-broker/src/offset/manager/consumer_offset_manager.rsLength of output: 989
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs (3)
28-29: Approval of structural definitions for response header.The
UpdateConsumerOffsetResponseHeaderstruct is well-defined with appropriate traits for serialization, which are crucial for network communication protocols.
31-40: Check for the use of optional fields in request headers.The
queue_idandcommit_offsetare marked as optional. Ensure that the business logic properly handles cases where these values might beNone, especially since queue ID and commit offset are critical for the operation.
71-92: Review of thefrommethod implementation.The method implementation for deserialization from a
HashMapseems correct. However, ensure that theunwrap_or_defaultusage aligns with expected behavior, particularly for critical fields likequeue_idandcommit_offset.Verification successful
Verify the deserialization logic for critical fields.
To ensure the
frommethod handles default values correctly, especially forqueue_idandcommit_offset, we need to check the usage and tests forUpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader.
Verify the deserialization logic in
consumer_manage_processor.rs.To ensure the
frommethod handles default values correctly, especially forqueue_idandcommit_offset, we need to check the usage inrocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs.
Verify the usage of
UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeaderinconsumer_manage_processor.rs.To ensure the
frommethod handles default values correctly, especially forqueue_idandcommit_offset, we need to check the usage ofUpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeaderinrocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rs.
Verify the interaction of
decode_command_custom_headerwithUpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader.To ensure the
frommethod handles default values correctly, especially forqueue_idandcommit_offset, we need to check the implementation ofdecode_command_custom_headerand its interaction withUpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader.
Review the implementation of
decode_command_custom_header.To ensure the
frommethod handles default values correctly, especially forqueue_idandcommit_offset, we need to check the implementation ofdecode_command_custom_headerinrocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs.
Verification successful: Deserialization logic handles default values correctly.
The
frommethod inUpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeadercorrectly usesunwrap_or_defaultto handle default values for fields, including critical ones likequeue_idandcommit_offset. Thedecode_command_custom_headermethod relies on this logic, ensuring proper deserialization.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rs: Implementation ofdecode_command_custom_header.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the deserialization logic's handling of default values. # Test: Review the deserialization logic in the context of actual usage. rg --type rust 'from'Length of output: 87894
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tests or usage examples of UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader to verify deserialization logic. rg 'UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader' --type rustLength of output: 3359
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of the from method in consumer_manage_processor.rs to verify deserialization logic. rg 'from' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsLength of output: 203
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader in consumer_manage_processor.rs to verify deserialization logic. rg 'UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/consumer_manage_processor.rsLength of output: 349
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the implementation of decode_command_custom_header to verify its interaction with UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader. rg 'decode_command_custom_header' --type rustLength of output: 3660
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Display the implementation of decode_command_custom_header in remoting_command.rs to verify its interaction with UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader. rg 'decode_command_custom_header' -A 20 rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/remoting_command.rsLength of output: 947
| @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ pub(crate) struct BrokerRuntime { | |||
| server_config: Arc<ServerConfig>, | |||
| topic_config_manager: TopicConfigManager, | |||
| topic_queue_mapping_manager: Arc<TopicQueueMappingManager>, | |||
| consumer_offset_manager: Arc<ConsumerOffsetManager>, | |||
| consumer_offset_manager: ConsumerOffsetManager, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor Suggestion: Consider using Arc for ConsumerOffsetManager.
Changing ConsumerOffsetManager from Arc<ConsumerOffsetManager> to a direct instance might lead to unnecessary cloning and potential performance degradation when the instance is shared across multiple threads. Consider maintaining the Arc wrapping to ensure efficient memory management and thread safety.
consumer_offset_manager: Arc<ConsumerOffsetManager>,| self.consumer_offset_manager | ||
| .set_message_store(Some(Arc::new(message_store.clone()))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure proper error handling when setting the message store.
The method set_message_store is called without checking the result or handling potential errors. It's crucial to handle errors during such operations to avoid runtime failures. Consider adding error handling or ensuring that the method can never fail under normal conditions.
if let Err(e) = self.consumer_offset_manager.set_message_store(Some(Arc::new(message_store.clone()))) {
error!("Failed to set message store: {:?}", e);
}| @@ -369,14 +371,17 @@ | |||
| self.topic_queue_mapping_manager.clone(), | |||
| self.consumer_manager.clone(), | |||
| self.consumer_filter_manager.clone(), | |||
| self.consumer_offset_manager.clone(), | |||
| Arc::new(self.consumer_offset_manager.clone()), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor suggestion: Avoid redundant cloning and simplify the code.
There are multiple instances where objects are cloned unnecessarily, especially when they are already wrapped in Arc. Simplifying this can improve performance and reduce memory usage.
let consumer_offset_manager = Arc::new(self.consumer_offset_manager.clone());
let topic_config_manager = Arc::new(self.topic_config_manager.clone());
let consumer_manage_processor = ConsumerManageProcessor::new(
self.broker_config.clone(),
self.consumer_manager.clone(),
self.topic_queue_mapping_manager.clone(),
self.subscription_group_manager.clone(),
consumer_offset_manager,
topic_config_manager,
self.message_store.clone().unwrap(),
);Also applies to: 379-384
| @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ | |||
| server_config, | |||
| topic_config_manager, | |||
| topic_queue_mapping_manager, | |||
| consumer_offset_manager: Arc::new(Default::default()), | |||
| consumer_offset_manager: ConsumerOffsetManager::new(broker_config.clone(), None), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Initialization of ConsumerOffsetManager needs to be wrapped with Arc.
The consumer_offset_manager is used in contexts that require thread safety, as evidenced by its wrapping in Arc in various processors. To maintain consistency and ensure thread-safe access, it should be initialized with Arc in the BrokerRuntime constructor.
- File:
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs - Line: 183
Analysis chain
Initialization of ConsumerOffsetManager needs clarification.
The initialization of ConsumerOffsetManager directly within the BrokerRuntime constructor without an Arc might cause issues if this instance is expected to be shared across threads or asynchronously accessed. Verify if this change aligns with the intended usage patterns and consider wrapping it with Arc if necessary.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all usages of `ConsumerOffsetManager` to ensure it's properly managed for thread safety.
# Test: Search for usages of `ConsumerOffsetManager`. Expect: Proper handling or wrapping with Arc where shared across threads.
rg --type rust $'ConsumerOffsetManager'
Length of output: 1687
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the usage of `consumer_offset_manager` within `BrokerRuntime` to determine if it requires `Arc`.
# Find all methods and usages of `consumer_offset_manager` in `BrokerRuntime`.
rg --type rust --context 10 'consumer_offset_manager' rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs
Length of output: 9288
| impl CommandCustomHeader for UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader { | ||
| fn to_map(&self) -> Option<HashMap<String, String>> { | ||
| let mut map = HashMap::new(); | ||
| map.insert( | ||
| Self::CONSUMER_GROUP.to_string(), | ||
| self.consumer_group.clone(), | ||
| ); | ||
| map.insert(Self::TOPIC.to_string(), self.topic.clone()); | ||
| if let Some(queue_id) = self.queue_id { | ||
| map.insert(Self::QUEUE_ID.to_string(), queue_id.to_string()); | ||
| } | ||
| if let Some(commit_offset) = self.commit_offset { | ||
| map.insert(Self::COMMIT_OFFSET.to_string(), commit_offset.to_string()); | ||
| } | ||
| if let Some(ref value) = self.topic_request_header { | ||
| if let Some(val) = value.to_map() { | ||
| map.extend(val); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| Some(map) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review of the to_map method implementation.
The method correctly serializes the header fields into a HashMap. However, consider using unwrap_or_else with a default function instead of unwrap_or_default to handle potential None values more explicitly, which could enhance readability and error handling.
- .unwrap_or_default(),
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| "".to_string()),Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| impl TopicRequestHeaderTrait for UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader { | ||
| fn with_lo(&mut self, lo: Option<bool>) { | ||
| self.topic_request_header.as_mut().unwrap().lo = lo; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn lo(&self) -> Option<bool> { | ||
| self.topic_request_header.as_ref().unwrap().lo | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn with_topic(&mut self, topic: String) { | ||
| self.topic = topic; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn topic(&self) -> String { | ||
| self.topic.clone() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn broker_name(&self) -> Option<String> { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .broker_name | ||
| .clone() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn with_broker_name(&mut self, broker_name: String) { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .broker_name = Some(broker_name); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn namespace(&self) -> Option<String> { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .namespace | ||
| .clone() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn with_namespace(&mut self, namespace: String) { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .namespace = Some(namespace); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn namespaced(&self) -> Option<bool> { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .namespaced | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn with_namespaced(&mut self, namespaced: bool) { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .namespaced = Some(namespaced); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn oneway(&self) -> Option<bool> { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_ref() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .oneway | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| fn with_oneway(&mut self, oneway: bool) { | ||
| self.topic_request_header | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .rpc | ||
| .as_mut() | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .oneway = Some(oneway); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Ensure safe usage of unwrap() in UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader trait implementation.
The unwrap() calls in methods like with_lo(), broker_name(), and others assume that topic_request_header and rpc are always Some. Without explicit checks, these assumptions can lead to runtime panics.
- File:
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs - Lines: 95-192
Consider adding checks or using safer alternatives like expect() with meaningful error messages or handling the None case gracefully.
Analysis chain
Review of trait implementations for request header.
The trait implementations provide necessary functionalities like setting and getting fields. Ensure that the use of unwrap() in methods like with_lo() and broker_name() is safe and won't lead to runtime panics.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify safety of unwrap usage in trait implementations.
# Test: Search for error handling related to these trait implementations.
rg --type rust 'unwrap()'
Length of output: 74318
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Extract context around unwrap() calls in the specified file to verify their safety.
rg --context 5 'unwrap()' rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs
Length of output: 4289
| let mut request_header = request | ||
| .decode_command_custom_header::<UpdateConsumerOffsetRequestHeader>() | ||
| .unwrap(); | ||
| let mut mapping_context = self | ||
| .topic_queue_mapping_manager | ||
| .build_topic_queue_mapping_context(&request_header, false); | ||
|
|
||
| let rewrite_result = self.rewrite_request_for_static_topic_for_consume_offset( | ||
| &mut request_header, | ||
| &mut mapping_context, | ||
| ); | ||
| if let Some(result) = rewrite_result { | ||
| return Some(result); | ||
| } | ||
| let topic = request_header.topic.as_str(); | ||
| let group = request_header.consumer_group.as_str(); | ||
| let queue_id = request_header.queue_id; | ||
| let offset = request_header.commit_offset; | ||
| let response = RemotingCommand::create_response_command(); | ||
| if !self | ||
| .subscription_group_manager | ||
| .contains_subscription_group(group) | ||
| { | ||
| return Some( | ||
| response | ||
| .set_code(ResponseCode::SubscriptionGroupNotExist) | ||
| .set_remark(Some(format!("subscription group not exist, {}", group))), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if !self.topic_config_manager.contains_topic(topic) { | ||
| return Some( | ||
| response | ||
| .set_code(ResponseCode::TopicNotExist) | ||
| .set_remark(Some(format!("topic not exist, {}", topic))), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if queue_id.is_none() { | ||
| return Some( | ||
| response | ||
| .set_code(ResponseCode::SystemError) | ||
| .set_remark(Some(format!("QueueId is null, topic is {}", topic))), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| if offset.is_none() { | ||
| return Some( | ||
| response | ||
| .set_code(ResponseCode::SystemError) | ||
| .set_remark(Some(format!("Offset is null, topic is {}", topic))), | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
| if self.broker_config.use_server_side_reset_offset | ||
| && self | ||
| .consumer_offset_manager | ||
| .has_offset_reset(topic, group, queue_id.unwrap()) | ||
| { | ||
| info!( | ||
| "Update consumer offset is rejected because of previous offset-reset. \ | ||
| Group={},Topic={}, QueueId={}, Offset={}", | ||
| topic, | ||
| group, | ||
| queue_id.unwrap(), | ||
| offset.unwrap() | ||
| ); | ||
| return Some(response.set_remark(Some("Offset has been previously reset".to_string()))); | ||
| } | ||
| self.consumer_offset_manager.commit_offset( | ||
| ctx.remoting_address(), | ||
| group, | ||
| topic, | ||
| queue_id.unwrap(), | ||
| offset.unwrap(), | ||
| ); | ||
| Some(response) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Tests missing for new conditions in update_consumer_offset method.
The new conditions added to the update_consumer_offset method, such as checking subscription group existence and topic existence, do not appear to be covered by existing test cases. It is crucial to add tests to verify these new conditions.
- Add unit tests for the
update_consumer_offsetmethod to cover the new conditions. - Ensure that the tests verify the existence of subscription groups and topics as implemented in the new logic.
Analysis chain
Review of the update_consumer_offset method.
This method has been significantly updated to handle new logic for updating consumer offsets. Ensure that all new conditions, such as checking subscription group existence and topic existence, are correctly implemented and tested.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new conditions in the `update_consumer_offset` method.
# Test: Search for unit tests covering these new conditions.
rg --type rust 'test' | grep 'update_consumer_offset'
Length of output: 467
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of the test cases in the specified file to verify coverage of new conditions.
cat rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs
Length of output: 8522
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test cases or modules that might cover the `update_consumer_offset` method in the entire codebase.
rg 'update_consumer_offset' --type rust
Length of output: 943
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for integration tests or higher-level test cases that might cover the `update_consumer_offset` method in the entire codebase.
rg 'test' --type rust | grep -i 'integration\|consumer_manage_processor'
Length of output: 72
|
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/update_consumer_offset_header.rs
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #700 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 27.26% 27.32% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 255 256 +1
Lines 19868 20113 +245
==========================================
+ Hits 5417 5495 +78
- Misses 14451 14618 +167 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #698
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
ConsumerOffsetManagerinitialization and methods.Documentation