update config file

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #issue_id

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated GitHub Actions workflow to improve automation and security for labeling on approval.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml file streamline the workflow by setting the GitHub Token directly in the environment, removing the need for GitHub App authentication, and updating the token value used during approval checks. This simplifies the workflow, making it more efficient and easier to maintain.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml	- Added environment setup for GitHub Token - Removed GitHub App authentication step - Updated approval check to use secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN or env.GITHUB_TOKEN

Poem

In the code where workflows sing,
Tokens set, no app to bring,
Approval flows with ease and grace,
Efficiency now takes its place.
🐇✨
Simplicity, our new found friend,
In GitHub's arms, our tasks now blend.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉, CodeRabbit will review your code.🔥

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.68%. Comparing base (c4dcc1d) to head (a96eea3).

❗ Current head a96eea3 differs from pull request most recent head 63ca469

Please upload reports for the commit 63ca469 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #589   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   25.68%   25.68%           
=======================================
  Files         232      232           
  Lines       16862    16862           
=======================================
  Hits         4331     4331           
  Misses      12531    12531           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉, CodeRabbit will review your code.🔥

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c4dcc1d and 63ca469.

Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (2 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (2)

.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (2)

46-46: The flexibility in token usage is a good practice. Please verify that both secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN and env.GITHUB_TOKEN are consistently used across your workflows for security and maintainability.

Verification successful

---

The token usage is consistent across the workflows, with all instances using secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN. The comment mentioning env.GITHUB_TOKEN is clear and doesn't introduce any inconsistencies.

• .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml: Uses secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN and comments on the potential use of env.GITHUB_TOKEN.
• .github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml: Uses secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN.
• .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml: Uses secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN.
• .github/workflows/automerge.yml: Uses secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent token usage across workflows.

# Test: Search for token usage patterns. Expect: Consistent usage of either secrets or environment variables.
rg --type yaml $'secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN|env.GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 577

---

32-34: LGTM! Please ensure that the token handling practices align with GitHub's security guidelines.

Verification successful

The search results indicate that GITHUB_TOKEN is used in several workflow files. Let's review each instance to ensure secure handling:

1. .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml

   • run: echo "GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ steps.auth.outputs.token }}" >> $GITHUB_ENV
   • github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # or ${{ env.GITHUB_TOKEN }} if using environment variable

2. .github/workflows/automerge.yml

   • GITHUB_TOKEN: "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}"
   • github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

3. .github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml

   • token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

4. .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

   • github-token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

Next Steps:

To ensure secure handling, we need to verify that:

• GITHUB_TOKEN is not exposed in logs.
• It is correctly set as an environment variable or as a secret.
• It is used in a secure context within each workflow.

Let's generate a script to extract and review the specific lines where GITHUB_TOKEN is used in each of these workflow files.

---

The review of the GITHUB_TOKEN usage in the workflow files indicates that the token is consistently handled as a secret and set as an environment variable. This aligns with GitHub's security guidelines for managing sensitive information.

• .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml

  • The token is set to the environment using $GITHUB_ENV.
  • The token is used securely within the github-script action.

• .github/workflows/automerge.yml

  • The token is set as an environment variable.
  • The token is used securely within the github-script action.

• .github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml

  • The token is provided as a secret to the auto-request-review action.

• .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml

  • The token is provided as a secret to the github-script action.

All instances reviewed indicate that GITHUB_TOKEN is used in a secure manner.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the GitHub token is used securely in other parts of the workflow.

# Test: Search for the token usage across the workflows. Expect: Secure practices.
rg --type yaml $'GITHUB_TOKEN' .github/workflows/

Length of output: 672

---

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Extract lines where GITHUB_TOKEN is used in the specified workflow files for detailed review.

# Files to review
files=(
  ".github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml"
  ".github/workflows/automerge.yml"
  ".github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml"
  ".github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml"
)

# Search for GITHUB_TOKEN usage in each file and display the surrounding context (3 lines before and after)
for file in "${files[@]}"; do
  echo "Reviewing $file"
  rg --context 3 'GITHUB_TOKEN' "$file"
  echo "-----------------------------"
done

Length of output: 3251