[ISSUE #542]🔨Add auto add label for pr approval #543
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
WalkthroughA new GitHub Actions workflow, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #543 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 25.39% 25.44% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 233 233
Lines 17029 17029
==========================================
+ Hits 4325 4333 +8
+ Misses 12704 12696 -8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@mxsm, I will review the changes now. Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1)
1-1: Ensure the workflow name is descriptive and specific.Consider renaming the workflow to more specifically reflect its function, such as "Auto Label PR on Approval".
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (4)
3-5: The trigger event setup is correctly configured for the intended use-case.
7-10: The job configuration, including the runner specification, is aptly chosen for this task.
11-14: Proper setup for repository checkout using a well-maintained action.
15-39: Review and test the script thoroughly to ensure it handles edge cases, such as multiple approvals or rejections followed by approvals. Also, ensure that thePAT_TOKENused is scoped correctly to minimize security risks.
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. [RUN_SCRIPTs] #!/bin/bash
# List all files changed in PR #543 to accurately identify the file containing the GitHub Actions workflow
git diff --name-only main...HEADAnalysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the content of the GitHub Actions workflow file 'label-on-approval.yml'
fd 'label-on-approval.yml' --exec cat {}
Length of output: 42 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Attempt to find the 'label-on-approval.yml' file using a broader search
rg --files --glob '*label-on-approval.yml'
Length of output: 44 Script: #!/bin/bash
# List all YAML files in the repository to identify potential GitHub Actions workflow files
rg --files --glob '*.yml'
Length of output: 27 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (3)
3-5: The trigger setup for pull request reviews is correctly configured to activate on submissions.
9-14: The job setup, including the runner and repository checkout, is appropriately configured.
1-41: The overall structure and integration of the workflow are well-aligned with the PR objectives.
| if (approved) { | ||
| const { data: collaborators } = await github.repos.listCollaborators({ owner, repo }); | ||
| const reviewer = context.payload.review.user.login; | ||
| const isOwner = collaborators.some(collab => collab.login === reviewer && collab.permissions.admin); | ||
|
|
||
| if (isOwner) { | ||
| await github.issues.addLabels({ | ||
| owner, | ||
| repo, | ||
| issue_number: pull_number, | ||
| labels: ['approved','auto merge'] | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure robustness by handling potential errors during API calls, such as when adding labels or fetching collaborators.
+ try {
await github.issues.addLabels({
owner,
repo,
issue_number: pull_number,
labels: ['approved','auto merge']
});
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to add labels:', error);
+ }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (approved) { | |
| const { data: collaborators } = await github.repos.listCollaborators({ owner, repo }); | |
| const reviewer = context.payload.review.user.login; | |
| const isOwner = collaborators.some(collab => collab.login === reviewer && collab.permissions.admin); | |
| if (isOwner) { | |
| await github.issues.addLabels({ | |
| owner, | |
| repo, | |
| issue_number: pull_number, | |
| labels: ['approved','auto merge'] | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| if (approved) { | |
| const { data: collaborators } = await github.repos.listCollaborators({ owner, repo }); | |
| const reviewer = context.payload.review.user.login; | |
| const isOwner = collaborators.some(collab => collab.login === reviewer && collab.permissions.admin); | |
| if (isOwner) { | |
| try { | |
| await github.issues.addLabels({ | |
| owner, | |
| repo, | |
| issue_number: pull_number, | |
| labels: ['approved','auto merge'] | |
| }); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to add labels:', error); | |
| } | |
| } |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
|
@mxsm, thank you for your patience. Based on the information provided and the content of the Review of
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (6)
1-1: LGTM! The workflow name is clearly defined.
3-5: The event trigger is well-defined forpull_request_reviewwith typesubmitted.
9-9: The job runs on the latest Ubuntu runner, which is a good choice for compatibility and performance.
11-13: Proper use of the GitHub Actions checkout step ensures the latest code is available for the workflow.
15-16: Usingactions/github-scriptis an efficient way to run JavaScript directly in your workflow.
27-39: The logic to check if the reviewer is an owner and then add labels is sound, but ensure robust error handling for API calls.
| - name: Check for approval and add label | ||
| uses: actions/github-script@v6 | ||
| env: | ||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using GITHUB_TOKEN for authentication to follow best practices and ensure security.
- GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }}
+ GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }} | |
| GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} |
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
|
@mxsm, thank you for your patience. Based on the information provided and the content of the Review of
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1)
3-6: Ensure the workflow is triggered only on relevant events to optimize resource usage.While the current setup triggers the workflow on any PR review submission, consider specifying additional conditions if necessary to prevent unnecessary runs.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (3)
26-38: Handle potential errors during API calls robustly.As previously suggested, wrapping API calls in a try-catch block is crucial to managing errors gracefully. This ensures that the workflow does not fail silently and provides debugging information in case of issues.
18-18: Use the standardGITHUB_TOKENfor authentication.- GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }} + GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}This change aligns with best practices and ensures that the workflow uses the built-in GitHub token, which has sufficient permissions for this operation and better security management.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
27-30: Verify collaborator permissions securely.Ensure that the method used for fetching collaborators and checking permissions is secure and optimized. Consider caching the collaborators' list if it does not change frequently to reduce API calls.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #542
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit