-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #520] 🐛Fix count_inner_msg_num method of message decoder mode #521
Conversation
WalkthroughThe key changes in Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
@coderabbitai summary |
Actions performedSummary regeneration triggered. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_decoder.rs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_decoder.rs (2)
288-289
: The modification to the loop condition and the method of extracting the size from bytes are critical improvements for robustness.Ensure that this change is well-tested, especially edge cases where the byte stream might be malformed or edge-padded.
311-313
: The test cases have been updated to reflect the changes in thecount_inner_msg_num
function. However, it's important to ensure that these tests cover various scenarios.Also applies to: 321-321
Verification successful
The search results indicate that there are multiple test cases for the
count_inner_msg_num
function, covering scenarios such as counting multiple messages, single messages, no messages, and ignoring incomplete messages. This suggests that various scenarios, including edge cases, are indeed covered in the test cases.
rocketmq-common/src/common/message/message_decoder.rs
:
fn count_inner_msg_num_counts_correctly_for_multiple_messages()
fn count_inner_msg_num_counts_correctly_for_single_message()
fn count_inner_msg_num_counts_zero_for_no_messages()
fn count_inner_msg_num_ignores_incomplete_messages()
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the test cases cover various scenarios for message counting. # Test: Search for test cases in the test file. Expect: Multiple scenarios including edge cases. rg --type rust "fn count_inner_msg_num" "tests/"Length of output: 95
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the test cases cover various scenarios for message counting. # Test: Search for test cases in the entire repository. Expect: Multiple scenarios including edge cases. rg --type rust "count_inner_msg_num"Length of output: 1220
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #521 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 25.37% 25.37%
=======================================
Files 233 233
Lines 17014 17014
=======================================
Hits 4317 4317
Misses 12697 12697 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@coderabbitai Approve |
@mxsm, I'm approving the changes as requested. Actions performedComments resolved. |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #520
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Tests