Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE ##516]✅Add test case for StoreType 🚧 #517

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shadowsoy
Copy link
Contributor

@shadowsoy shadowsoy commented Jun 13, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #516

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added test functions to ensure get_store_type, serialize, deserialize, and panic handling for unknown variants in StoreType enum are functioning correctly.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes include adding comprehensive test cases for the StoreType enum in the rocketmq-store/src/base/store_enum.rs file. These test cases cover functionality such as obtaining the store type as a string, serializing to JSON, deserializing from JSON, and handling unknown variants correctly.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/base/store_enum.rs Added test functions: get_store_type_returns_correct_string, serialize_returns_correct_json, deserialize_returns_correct_enum, deserialize_panics_on_unknown_variant

Sequence Diagram(s)

No sequence diagram provided due to the simplicity and specificity of the changes.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add test case for StoreType [#516]

Poem

In fields of code where enums play,
New tests were born, to pave the way.
Serialize, deserialize, with flair,
Ensuring StoreType treats all fair.
Through tests' embrace, no bugs shall stay,
Rejoice, for RocketMQ is here to stay! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.37%. Comparing base (4b36381) to head (ecf13c3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #517      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.17%   25.37%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files         233      233              
  Lines       16984    17011      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits         4275     4317      +42     
+ Misses      12709    12694      -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4b36381 and ecf13c3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/base/store_enum.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
rocketmq-store/src/base/store_enum.rs (4)

92-96: The test function get_store_type_returns_correct_string is well implemented and covers all variants of the StoreType enum.


98-108: The test function serialize_returns_correct_json correctly validates the JSON serialization of the StoreType enum variants.


110-117: The test function deserialize_returns_correct_enum is effectively validating the deserialization of JSON strings into the correct StoreType enum variants.


119-123: The test function deserialize_panics_on_unknown_variant effectively ensures that the deserialization process correctly panics when encountering an unknown variant, with the expected error message.

@mxsm mxsm merged commit 7b7dc26 into mxsm:main Jun 13, 2024
9 checks passed
@shadowsoy shadowsoy deleted the test-516 branch June 14, 2024 03:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Test]Add test case for StoreType
2 participants