Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2188]💫Remove SyncUnsafeCellWrapper from mmapped_file🍻 #2189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 10, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2188

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified memory-mapped file handling by removing synchronization wrapper
    • Streamlined code for direct access to memory-mapped file instances

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on simplifying the memory-mapped file handling in the RocketMQ Rust implementation. The primary change involves removing the SyncUnsafeCellWrapper from the mmapped_file field in the DefaultMappedFile struct, directly using MmapMut instead. This modification streamlines the code by eliminating an additional synchronization wrapper, potentially improving the directness of memory management in the file mapping implementation.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs - Updated mmapped_file field type from SyncUnsafeCellWrapper<MmapMut> to MmapMut
- Modified constructor methods to directly assign MmapMut
- Updated get_mapped_file_mut and get_mapped_file to access mmapped_file directly

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove SyncUnsafeCellWrapper from mmapped_file [#2188]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor♻️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • rocketmq-rust-bot
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Mapped Files 🗄️

Wrapper gone, memory freed,
MmapMut dancing with pure speed,
Rust's elegance, simple and bright,
Code simplified, a coder's delight!
Hop, hop, refactoring we go! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1)

Line range hint 1-781: Consider adopting Rust's safe abstractions.

The codebase could benefit from using Rust's safe abstractions to handle concurrent access to memory-mapped files:

  1. Replace raw pointer manipulation with safe alternatives like RefCell or Mutex
  2. Consider using parking_lot crate for more efficient synchronization primitives
  3. Document the safety invariants that must be upheld by unsafe code
  4. Add compile-time checks using static_assertions crate

This would improve maintainability and reduce the risk of memory safety issues.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df73292 and 7c9e6ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs (1)

125-125: LGTM: Constructor assignments are consistent.

The direct assignment of MmapMut in both constructors is consistent with the field type change.

Also applies to: 207-207

Comment on lines +697 to +704
#[allow(clippy::mut_from_ref)]
pub fn get_mapped_file_mut(&self) -> &mut MmapMut {
self.mmapped_file.mut_from_ref()
unsafe { &mut *(self.mmapped_file.as_ptr() as *mut MmapMut) }
}

#[inline]
pub fn get_mapped_file(&self) -> &MmapMut {
self.mmapped_file.as_ref()
unsafe { &*(self.mmapped_file.as_ptr() as *const MmapMut) }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix unsafe mutable reference handling.

The current implementation of get_mapped_file_mut violates Rust's aliasing rules by potentially creating multiple mutable references to the same data. Consider these alternatives:

  1. Use interior mutability with RefCell or Mutex
  2. Make the method require &mut self
  3. Document why the current unsafe implementation is sound

Additionally, get_mapped_file could be simplified to avoid unnecessary pointer casting.

Consider this safer implementation:

-#[allow(clippy::mut_from_ref)]
-pub fn get_mapped_file_mut(&self) -> &mut MmapMut {
-    unsafe { &mut *(self.mmapped_file.as_ptr() as *mut MmapMut) }
-}
+pub fn get_mapped_file_mut(&mut self) -> &mut MmapMut {
+    &mut self.mmapped_file
+}

-pub fn get_mapped_file(&self) -> &MmapMut {
-    unsafe { &*(self.mmapped_file.as_ptr() as *const MmapMut) }
-}
+pub fn get_mapped_file(&self) -> &MmapMut {
+    &self.mmapped_file
+}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@@ -58,7 +57,7 @@
pub struct DefaultMappedFile {
reference_resource: ReferenceResourceImpl,
file: File,
mmapped_file: SyncUnsafeCellWrapper<MmapMut>,
mmapped_file: MmapMut,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Confirmed thread-safety issues after SyncUnsafeCellWrapper removal

The verification reveals serious thread-safety concerns:

  • While metadata (positions, timestamps) is protected using atomic types, the actual memory-mapped file content lacks proper synchronization
  • get_mapped_file_mut() can create multiple mutable references to MmapMut, violating Rust's aliasing rules
  • Direct access to MmapMut without synchronization could lead to data races in concurrent scenarios

Consider wrapping MmapMut in a proper synchronization primitive like RwLock to ensure thread-safe access to the memory-mapped content.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify thread-safety after removing SyncUnsafeCellWrapper.

The removal of SyncUnsafeCellWrapper might impact thread-safety. Ensure that all access to mmapped_file is properly synchronized through other mechanisms.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all concurrent access patterns to mmapped_file
rg -A 5 "mmapped_file" | rg -B 5 "async|thread|concurrent|parallel|sync|lock|mutex"

# Search for any synchronization mechanisms around MmapMut usage
ast-grep --pattern 'MmapMut'

Length of output: 701


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for synchronization mechanisms around mmapped_file
rg -B 5 -A 10 "mmapped_file" rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs

# Look for method signatures and concurrent access patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'impl DefaultMappedFileImpl {
  $$$
  pub fn $_(&$_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Search for Mutex/RwLock usage
rg "Mutex|RwLock" rocketmq-store/src/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs

Length of output: 2497

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 25.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.75%. Comparing base (df73292) to head (7c9e6ba).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...c/log_file/mapped_file/default_mapped_file_impl.rs 25.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2189      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.75%   28.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         498      498              
  Lines       71059    71059              
==========================================
- Hits        20435    20430       -5     
- Misses      50624    50629       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit fb16dc9 into main Jan 10, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request rocketmq-store crate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Remove SyncUnsafeCellWrapper from mmapped_file
3 participants