Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1516]♻️Refactor GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec #2165

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 8, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1516

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a required namespace field to the GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader struct
    • Enhanced header struct with RequestHeaderCodec derive macro
  • Tests

    • Added comprehensive unit tests for various request and response headers

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring the GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader struct in the rocketmq-remoting module. The changes include adding the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro to the struct, introducing a required namespace field, and removing the previous CommandCustomHeader trait implementation. The modifications aim to simplify the header's implementation while enhancing its functionality through the derive macro.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs - Added RequestHeaderCodec derive macro to GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader
- Added required namespace field to the struct
- Removed CommandCustomHeader trait implementation

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader with RequestHeaderCodec derive macro [#1516]
Ensure no new bugs are introduced
Update unit tests

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement⚡️, refactor♻️, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, a header takes flight,
Refactored with macros, oh what a delight!
Namespace added, traits stripped away,
RocketMQ's structure shines bright today.
A rabbit's dance of clean design! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 8, 2025
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot self-requested a review January 8, 2025 06:10
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added enhancement⚡️ New feature or request refactor♻️ refactor code labels Jan 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs (2)

215-233: Consider adding more test cases for GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader

While the current tests are well-structured and cover the basic functionality, consider adding:

  1. Test for Default trait implementation
  2. Negative test cases (e.g., deserialization with missing required fields)

Example test cases to add:

#[test]
fn get_kv_list_by_namespace_request_header_default() {
    let header = GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader::default();
    assert_eq!(header.namespace, CheetahString::default());
}

#[test]
fn get_kv_list_by_namespace_request_header_missing_required_field() {
    let json = "{}";
    let result = serde_json::from_str::<GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader>(json);
    assert!(result.is_err());
}

104-233: Great architectural improvement using derive macros

The refactoring to use RequestHeaderCodec derive macro is a solid architectural choice that:

  1. Reduces boilerplate code
  2. Decreases the likelihood of implementation errors
  3. Makes the code more maintainable and consistent
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c8e541c and 252a11a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs (2)

104-107: LGTM! Clean refactor of GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader

The struct has been successfully refactored to use the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro, maintaining consistency with other request headers in the file. The required namespace field is properly annotated.


109-116: LGTM! Clean implementation of the constructor

The new() method follows the established pattern, using impl Into<CheetahString> for flexible parameter types.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.75000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.67%. Comparing base (c8e541c) to head (252a11a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...ng/src/protocol/header/namesrv/kv_config_header.rs 98.75% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2165      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   28.54%   28.67%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files         498      498              
  Lines       71005    71070      +65     
==========================================
+ Hits        20267    20376     +109     
+ Misses      50738    50694      -44     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge Difficulty level/Easy Easy ISSUE enhancement⚡️ New feature or request refactor♻️ refactor code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Refactor♻️]Refactor GetKVListByNamespaceRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec
3 participants