Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2075]💫Implement PopReviveService#getReviveMessage🚀 #2078

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 4, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2075

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced message retrieval functionality for message revival scenarios
    • Added support for retrieving messages based on specific offset and queue ID

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new asynchronous method get_revive_message to the PopReviveService struct in the RocketMQ broker. The method retrieves messages for revival by utilizing the existing get_message function, with added logic to handle specific scenarios like illegal offsets and message queue tail conditions. A helper function reach_tail is also implemented to determine when the message queue's end is reached.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs - Added get_revive_message async method
- Added reach_tail helper function

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Implement PopReviveService#getReviveMessage [#2075]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first, rocketmq-broker crate

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🐰 In the realm of message queues so bright,
A revival service takes its flight,
Offsets dance, messages leap,
Through RocketMQ's algorithmic deep,
A rabbit's code, precise and light! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot self-requested a review January 4, 2025 07:01
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added the waiting-review waiting review this PR label Jan 4, 2025
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Jan 4, 2025
@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 4, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 37 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.35%. Comparing base (f93a956) to head (00013f7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs 0.00% 37 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2078      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.36%   28.35%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         489      489              
  Lines       69495    69532      +37     
==========================================
  Hits        19713    19713              
- Misses      49782    49819      +37     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs (2)

205-207: Consider adding a debug log or returning early when reach_tail is true.
A small debug log would help confirm that the function does nothing intentionally. Without it, debugging might be slightly more difficult to track.

 if reach_tail(&pull_result, offset) {
-    //nothing to do
+    tracing::debug!("Reached tail at offset: {}, no further revival needed.", offset);
 }

288-292: Disambiguate boolean expression or add parentheses for clarity.
As written, the expression effectively reads:

pull_status == NoNewMsg || (pull_status == OffsetIllegal && offset == max_offset)

Make sure this is the intended logic. If not, consider adding parentheses or splitting conditions into separate if statements to avoid confusion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f93a956 and 00013f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/processor_service/pop_revive_service.rs (2)

195-204: Validate possible edge cases in pull_result.
When get_message returns a PullResult, it may have a None in msg_found_list if no messages were found. Although the function returns an Option<Vec<ArcMut<MessageExt>>>, ensuring you cover (and potentially log) unexpected None scenarios can improve reliability.

Would you like an automated script to locate and log all None returns of get_message in the codebase for deeper analysis?


221-222: Implementation looks clean and straightforward.
Returning pull_result.msg_found_list ensures that message retrieval logic is nicely encapsulated and consistent with the rest of the method flow.

Comment on lines +208 to +220
|| pull_result.pull_status == PullStatus::NoMatchedMsg
{
if !self.should_run_pop_revive {
return None;
}
self.consumer_offset_manager.commit_offset(
CheetahString::from_static_str(PopAckConstants::LOCAL_HOST),
&CheetahString::from_static_str(PopAckConstants::REVIVE_GROUP),
&self.revive_topic,
queue_id,
pull_result.next_begin_offset as i64 - 1,
);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Clamp the committed offset to avoid negative values.
When next_begin_offset is 0, subtracting 1 results in -1. Committing a negative offset can lead to unexpected behavior in some storage or offset manager implementations.

-                pull_result.next_begin_offset as i64 - 1,
+                (pull_result.next_begin_offset as i64 - 1).max(0),
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
|| pull_result.pull_status == PullStatus::NoMatchedMsg
{
if !self.should_run_pop_revive {
return None;
}
self.consumer_offset_manager.commit_offset(
CheetahString::from_static_str(PopAckConstants::LOCAL_HOST),
&CheetahString::from_static_str(PopAckConstants::REVIVE_GROUP),
&self.revive_topic,
queue_id,
pull_result.next_begin_offset as i64 - 1,
);
}
|| pull_result.pull_status == PullStatus::NoMatchedMsg
{
if !self.should_run_pop_revive {
return None;
}
self.consumer_offset_manager.commit_offset(
CheetahString::from_static_str(PopAckConstants::LOCAL_HOST),
&CheetahString::from_static_str(PopAckConstants::REVIVE_GROUP),
&self.revive_topic,
queue_id,
(pull_result.next_begin_offset as i64 - 1).max(0),
);
}

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Implement PopReviveService#getReviveMessage
3 participants