[ISSUE #1680]♻️Refactor ChangeInvisibleTimeProcessor handle logic🍻 #1683
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1683 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 27.60% 27.60% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 470 470
Lines 62969 62971 +2
==========================================
Hits 17380 17380
- Misses 45589 45591 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/change_invisible_time_processor.rs (2)
26-34: Consider using an immutable reference toselfThe
process_requestmethod currently takes&mut self, but there is no apparent mutation of the struct's state within the method. If no fields ofselfare being modified, consider changing the receiver to an immutable reference to enhance code safety and clarify intent.Apply this diff to adjust the method signature:
pub async fn process_request( - &mut self, + &self, _channel: Channel, _ctx: ConnectionHandlerContext, _request_code: RequestCode, _request: RemotingCommand, ) -> crate::Result<Option<RemotingCommand>> { unimplemented!("ChangeInvisibleTimeProcessor process_request") }
26-34: Add documentation comments to theprocess_requestmethodIncluding Rustdoc comments will enhance code comprehension and assist other developers in understanding the method's purpose and usage.
Apply this diff to add documentation:
impl ChangeInvisibleTimeProcessor { + /// Processes the request to change the invisible time of a message. pub async fn process_request( &mut self, _channel: Channel, _ctx: ConnectionHandlerContext, _request_code: RequestCode, _request: RemotingCommand, ) -> crate::Result<Option<RemotingCommand>> { unimplemented!("ChangeInvisibleTimeProcessor process_request") } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/change_invisible_time_processor.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/change_invisible_time_processor.rs (1)
26-34: Verify consistency of process_request method signatures across processors
To maintain consistency across different processor implementations, please ensure that the process_request method signature aligns with those in other processors. Consistent method signatures improve readability and reduce potential integration issues.
Run the following script to list all process_request method signatures in processor implementations:
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the output from the shell script. The results show that the process_request method signature in change_invisible_time_processor.rs is consistent with other processor implementations in the codebase. All processors follow the same signature pattern:
pub async fn process_request(
&mut self,
channel: Channel,
ctx: ConnectionHandlerContext,
request_code: RequestCode,
request: RemotingCommand,
)The only variation is that some processors prefix unused parameters with underscore (_), which is a Rust convention to suppress unused variable warnings.
Method signature is consistent with other processors
The process_request method signature in change_invisible_time_processor.rs perfectly aligns with the standard signature used across all processor implementations in the codebase. The use of underscore prefixes for unused parameters follows proper Rust conventions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all `process_request` method signatures in processor implementations.
# Find all processor Rust files
fd --extension rs 'processor' | while read -r file; do
# Print the file name and method signature
echo "$file:"
rg 'pub async fn process_request' "$file" -A 5
done
Length of output: 7791
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1680
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes