-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #1611]🚀ClientRemotingProcessor supports RequestCode::ConsumeMessageDirectly(309)🔥 #1614
Conversation
…ssageDirectly(309)🔥
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve significant modifications to various services and implementations related to message consumption in the RocketMQ client. Key updates include altering the method signatures of Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs (1)
313-316
: Correct grammatical error in error messageThe error message in lines 314-316 should use proper grammar for clarity. Change "not exist" to "does not exist".
Apply this diff to correct the error message:
.set_remark(format!( - "The Consumer Group <{}> not exist in this consumer", + "The Consumer Group <{}> does not exist in this consumer", request_header.consumer_group ))rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_concurrently_service.rs (1)
275-277
: Consider passingMessageExt
by reference to avoid unnecessary copyingThe parameter
msg
is now passed by value, which may lead to performance overhead ifMessageExt
is a large struct. Consider passing it by reference (&MessageExt
) or using smart pointers likeArc
to improve efficiency.rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_orderly_service.rs (1)
440-442
: Optimize parameter passing forMessageExt
Passing
msg
by value could introduce performance issues due to copying. Consider passing it by reference (&MessageExt
) to avoid unnecessary data duplication.rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_orderly_service.rs (1)
58-60
: PassMessageExt
by reference to improve performanceCurrently,
msg
is consumed by value, which may be inefficient. Passing it by reference (&MessageExt
) can enhance performance by avoiding unnecessary copies.rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs (1)
87-89
: Avoid unnecessary copying ofMessageExt
Passing
msg
by value may result in performance degradation. It's advisable to pass it by reference (&MessageExt
) or use smart pointers to optimize memory usage.rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_service.rs (2)
93-94
: Consider performance implications of taking MessageExt by valueTaking
MessageExt
by value instead of reference could lead to unnecessary cloning of potentially large message data. Consider using a reference unless ownership transfer is specifically required.- msg: MessageExt, + msg: &MessageExt,
253-254
: Trait method signature should be consistent with implementation recommendationsFor consistency with the earlier recommendation about MessageExt performance, the trait method should also use a reference.
- msg: MessageExt, + msg: &MessageExt,rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (1)
720-741
: Add documentation and logging for better maintainability.The implementation looks good and correctly handles the delegation to appropriate services. Consider these improvements:
- Add documentation:
+/// Consumes a message directly using either the regular or pop consumption service. +/// +/// # Arguments +/// * `msg` - The message to be consumed +/// * `broker_name` - Optional broker name where the message originated +/// +/// # Returns +/// * `Some(ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult)` if a service is available and consumption succeeds +/// * `None` if no consumption service is available
- Add debug logging for better observability:
pub(crate) async fn consume_message_directly( &self, msg: MessageExt, broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, ) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> { + debug!("Attempting to consume message directly: msg_id={}", msg.msg_id); if let Some(consume_message_service) = self.consume_message_service.as_ref() { + debug!("Using regular consumption service"); Some( consume_message_service .consume_message_directly(msg, broker_name) .await, ) } else if let Some(consume_message_pop_service) = self.consume_message_pop_service.as_ref() { + debug!("Using pop consumption service"); Some( consume_message_pop_service .consume_message_directly(msg, broker_name) .await, ) } else { + warn!("No consumption service available for direct message consumption"); None } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_concurrently_service.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_orderly_service.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs
(1 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_orderly_service.rs
(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_service.rs
(4 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs
(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs
(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs
(2 hunks)rocketmq-client/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs
(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs (1)
133-146
: LGTM! Well-structured implementation
The implementation properly handles:
- Weak reference checking and upgrading
- Proper error propagation through Option
- Clean and idiomatic Rust code structure
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (1)
41-41
: LGTM!
The import is correctly placed and necessary for the new functionality.
msg: MessageExt, | ||
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement consume_message_directly
method
The consume_message_directly
method currently contains a todo!()
placeholder. Please provide an implementation to support direct message consumption functionality.
msg: MessageExt, | ||
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement consume_message_directly
method
The consume_message_directly
method uses todo!()
and lacks an implementation. Implement this method to enable direct message consumption.
msg: MessageExt, | ||
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement consume_message_directly
method
The method consume_message_directly
is unimplemented and contains todo!()
. Please provide the necessary implementation to support this functionality.
msg: MessageExt, | ||
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implement consume_message_directly
method
The consume_message_directly
method is currently a stub with todo!()
. Implement this method to complete the direct message consumption feature.
pub(crate) async fn consume_message_directly( | ||
&self, | ||
msg: &MessageExt, | ||
broker_name: &str, | ||
msg: MessageExt, | ||
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult { | ||
todo!() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Implementation missing for ConsumeMessagePopServiceGeneral
The consume_message_directly
method is marked with todo!()
. This could cause runtime panics in production. Implementation is required before this code can be safely deployed.
pub async fn consume_message_directly( | ||
&self, | ||
message: MessageExt, | ||
consumer_group: &CheetahString, | ||
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> { | ||
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await; | ||
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group); | ||
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner { | ||
consumer | ||
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name) | ||
.await; | ||
} | ||
|
||
None | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix critical bug in return value handling
The implementation ignores the result of consume_message_directly
and always returns None
. This could mask successful message consumption results.
Apply this fix:
pub async fn consume_message_directly(
&self,
message: MessageExt,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> {
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await;
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group);
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner {
- consumer
+ return consumer
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name)
- .await;
+ .await
}
None
}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
pub async fn consume_message_directly( | |
&self, | |
message: MessageExt, | |
consumer_group: &CheetahString, | |
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | |
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> { | |
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await; | |
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group); | |
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner { | |
consumer | |
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name) | |
.await; | |
} | |
None | |
} | |
pub async fn consume_message_directly( | |
&self, | |
message: MessageExt, | |
consumer_group: &CheetahString, | |
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>, | |
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> { | |
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await; | |
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group); | |
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner { | |
return consumer | |
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name) | |
.await | |
} | |
None | |
} |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1611
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores