Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1611]🚀ClientRemotingProcessor supports RequestCode::ConsumeMessageDirectly(309)🔥 #1614

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Dec 6, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1611

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method for direct message consumption across various services, enhancing flexibility in message handling.
    • Updated method signatures to allow optional broker names, improving the handling of message consumption scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined error handling and acknowledgment processes for message consumption, ensuring more reliable message processing.
  • Documentation

    • Added import statements for new types related to direct message consumption, improving clarity and functionality.
  • Chores

    • Cleaned up method signatures and improved internal logic for better performance and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve significant modifications to various services and implementations related to message consumption in the RocketMQ client. Key updates include altering the method signatures of consume_message_directly to accept MessageExt by value and broker_name as an Option<CheetahString>. Additionally, new methods for direct message consumption have been introduced in several structs, enhancing the overall functionality and flexibility of message handling. The changes also improve acknowledgment and error management processes within the message consumption workflow.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_concurrently_service.rs Updated consume_message_directly method to accept Option<CheetahString> for broker_name. Enhanced process_consume_result for acknowledgment handling and refined message failure management. Improved batch processing in submit_consume_request.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_orderly_service.rs Updated consume_message_directly method to accept Option<CheetahString> for broker_name. Added dispatch_to_consume parameter in submit_consume_request. Enhanced run method for better message consumption control.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs Updated consume_message_directly method to accept Option<CheetahString> for broker_name.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_orderly_service.rs Updated consume_message_directly method to accept Option<CheetahString> for broker_name.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_service.rs Updated consume_message_directly method to accept Option<CheetahString> for broker_name. Changed visibility of consume_message_directly in ConsumeMessagePopServiceGeneral to pub(crate).
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs Added consume_message_directly method to DefaultMQPushConsumerImpl for direct message consumption.
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs Added consume_message_directly method to MQConsumerInnerImpl for direct message consumption.
rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs Added consume_message_directly method to MQClientInstance for message consumption.
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs Added consume_message_directly method to ClientRemotingProcessor for handling direct message consumption requests. Modified process_request to utilize the new method.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Support RequestCode::ConsumeMessageDirectly(309) in ClientRemotingProcessor (#1611)

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • SpaceXCN
  • TeslaRustor

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where messages flow,
A new way to consume, oh what a show!
With options for brokers, both here and there,
Our Rabbit hops high, spreading joy everywhere!
So let’s raise our paws for this change we adore,
Direct message magic, who could ask for more? 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Dec 6, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Dec 6, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 100 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 25.61%. Comparing base (4718cd1) to head (3ebbf74).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nt/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs 0.00% 43 Missing ⚠️
...mer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
.../consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_service.rs 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
...sumer_impl/consume_message_concurrently_service.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...r/consumer_impl/consume_message_orderly_service.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...r_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...nsumer_impl/consume_message_pop_orderly_service.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1614      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   25.65%   25.61%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         459      459              
  Lines       60709    60795      +86     
==========================================
  Hits        15572    15572              
- Misses      45137    45223      +86     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
rocketmq-client/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs (1)

313-316: Correct grammatical error in error message

The error message in lines 314-316 should use proper grammar for clarity. Change "not exist" to "does not exist".

Apply this diff to correct the error message:

.set_remark(format!(
-    "The Consumer Group <{}> not exist in this consumer",
+    "The Consumer Group <{}> does not exist in this consumer",
     request_header.consumer_group
))
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_concurrently_service.rs (1)

275-277: Consider passing MessageExt by reference to avoid unnecessary copying

The parameter msg is now passed by value, which may lead to performance overhead if MessageExt is a large struct. Consider passing it by reference (&MessageExt) or using smart pointers like Arc to improve efficiency.

rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_orderly_service.rs (1)

440-442: Optimize parameter passing for MessageExt

Passing msg by value could introduce performance issues due to copying. Consider passing it by reference (&MessageExt) to avoid unnecessary data duplication.

rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_orderly_service.rs (1)

58-60: Pass MessageExt by reference to improve performance

Currently, msg is consumed by value, which may be inefficient. Passing it by reference (&MessageExt) can enhance performance by avoiding unnecessary copies.

rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs (1)

87-89: Avoid unnecessary copying of MessageExt

Passing msg by value may result in performance degradation. It's advisable to pass it by reference (&MessageExt) or use smart pointers to optimize memory usage.

rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_service.rs (2)

93-94: Consider performance implications of taking MessageExt by value

Taking MessageExt by value instead of reference could lead to unnecessary cloning of potentially large message data. Consider using a reference unless ownership transfer is specifically required.

-    msg: MessageExt,
+    msg: &MessageExt,

253-254: Trait method signature should be consistent with implementation recommendations

For consistency with the earlier recommendation about MessageExt performance, the trait method should also use a reference.

-    msg: MessageExt,
+    msg: &MessageExt,
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (1)

720-741: Add documentation and logging for better maintainability.

The implementation looks good and correctly handles the delegation to appropriate services. Consider these improvements:

  1. Add documentation:
+/// Consumes a message directly using either the regular or pop consumption service.
+/// 
+/// # Arguments
+/// * `msg` - The message to be consumed
+/// * `broker_name` - Optional broker name where the message originated
+/// 
+/// # Returns
+/// * `Some(ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult)` if a service is available and consumption succeeds
+/// * `None` if no consumption service is available
  1. Add debug logging for better observability:
 pub(crate) async fn consume_message_directly(
     &self,
     msg: MessageExt,
     broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
 ) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> {
+    debug!("Attempting to consume message directly: msg_id={}", msg.msg_id);
     if let Some(consume_message_service) = self.consume_message_service.as_ref() {
+        debug!("Using regular consumption service");
         Some(
             consume_message_service
                 .consume_message_directly(msg, broker_name)
                 .await,
         )
     } else if let Some(consume_message_pop_service) = self.consume_message_pop_service.as_ref()
     {
+        debug!("Using pop consumption service");
         Some(
             consume_message_pop_service
                 .consume_message_directly(msg, broker_name)
                 .await,
         )
     } else {
+        warn!("No consumption service available for direct message consumption");
         None
     }
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4718cd1 and 3ebbf74.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_concurrently_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_orderly_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_concurrently_service.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_pop_orderly_service.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/consume_message_service.rs (4 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/factory/mq_client_instance.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-client/src/implementation/client_remoting_processor.rs (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/mq_consumer_inner.rs (1)

133-146: LGTM! Well-structured implementation

The implementation properly handles:

  • Weak reference checking and upgrading
  • Proper error propagation through Option
  • Clean and idiomatic Rust code structure
rocketmq-client/src/consumer/consumer_impl/default_mq_push_consumer_impl.rs (1)

41-41: LGTM!

The import is correctly placed and necessary for the new functionality.

Comment on lines +275 to 277
msg: MessageExt,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement consume_message_directly method

The consume_message_directly method currently contains a todo!() placeholder. Please provide an implementation to support direct message consumption functionality.

Comment on lines +440 to 442
msg: MessageExt,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement consume_message_directly method

The consume_message_directly method uses todo!() and lacks an implementation. Implement this method to enable direct message consumption.

Comment on lines +58 to 60
msg: MessageExt,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement consume_message_directly method

The method consume_message_directly is unimplemented and contains todo!(). Please provide the necessary implementation to support this functionality.

Comment on lines +87 to 89
msg: MessageExt,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implement consume_message_directly method

The consume_message_directly method is currently a stub with todo!(). Implement this method to complete the direct message consumption feature.

Comment on lines +210 to 215
pub(crate) async fn consume_message_directly(
&self,
msg: &MessageExt,
broker_name: &str,
msg: MessageExt,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult {
todo!()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Implementation missing for ConsumeMessagePopServiceGeneral

The consume_message_directly method is marked with todo!(). This could cause runtime panics in production. Implementation is required before this code can be safely deployed.

Comment on lines +1188 to +1203
pub async fn consume_message_directly(
&self,
message: MessageExt,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> {
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await;
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group);
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner {
consumer
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name)
.await;
}

None
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix critical bug in return value handling

The implementation ignores the result of consume_message_directly and always returns None. This could mask successful message consumption results.

Apply this fix:

     pub async fn consume_message_directly(
         &self,
         message: MessageExt,
         consumer_group: &CheetahString,
         broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
     ) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> {
         let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await;
         let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group);
         if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner {
-            consumer
+            return consumer
                 .consume_message_directly(message, broker_name)
-                .await;
+                .await
         }
 
         None
     }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
pub async fn consume_message_directly(
&self,
message: MessageExt,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> {
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await;
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group);
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner {
consumer
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name)
.await;
}
None
}
pub async fn consume_message_directly(
&self,
message: MessageExt,
consumer_group: &CheetahString,
broker_name: Option<CheetahString>,
) -> Option<ConsumeMessageDirectlyResult> {
let consumer_table = self.consumer_table.read().await;
let consumer_inner = consumer_table.get(consumer_group);
if let Some(consumer) = consumer_inner {
return consumer
.consume_message_directly(message, broker_name)
.await
}
None
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] ClientRemotingProcessor supports RequestCode::ConsumeMessageDirectly(309)
4 participants