Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1396]🔥Remove unused crate in rocketmq-store #1397

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 28, 2024

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 28, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1396

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed several unnecessary dependencies to streamline the package.
    • Downgraded the sysinfo dependency version for compatibility.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The Cargo.toml file for the rocketmq-store package has been modified to remove several dependencies, including rocketmq-runtime, various tokio and futures libraries, and mockall. The version of the sysinfo dependency has been downgraded from 0.32.1 to 0.32.0. These changes streamline the dependency list while maintaining the overall structure of the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml Removed dependencies: rocketmq-runtime, tokio-util, tokio-stream, futures, futures-util, futures-core, futures-sink; downgraded sysinfo from 0.32.1 to 0.32.0; removed mockall from [dev-dependencies].

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove unused crate in rocketmq-store (#1396)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

enhancement, approved, auto merge

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

In the garden of code, we prune and we trim,
Removing the clutter, our chances grow slim.
With dependencies lighter, our project will soar,
A streamlined Cargo.toml, we cherish and adore! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83ff7de and 5507f45.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Cargo.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml (3)

32-32: Verify removal of tokio-related dependencies

The removal of tokio-util and tokio-stream dependencies needs verification to ensure it doesn't impact existing functionality.

✅ Verification successful

Removal of tokio dependencies is safe

The removal of tokio-util and tokio-stream dependencies from rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml is safe because:

  • No direct usage of these dependencies was found in the rocketmq-store codebase
  • No imports of types from these dependencies exist in rocketmq-store
  • While rocketmq-store is used by other crates (broker, cli), the removed dependencies were not being used internally
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of removed tokio dependencies

# Search for tokio-util usage
echo "Checking for tokio-util usage:"
rg -l "tokio[_-]util" 

# Search for tokio-stream usage
echo "Checking for tokio-stream usage:"
rg -l "tokio[_-]stream"

Length of output: 599


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if rocketmq-store has any direct usage of tokio-util or tokio-stream
echo "Checking rocketmq-store directory for tokio dependencies usage:"
rg -l "tokio[_-](util|stream)" rocketmq-store/

# Check if rocketmq-store has any imports or uses of tokio-util or tokio-stream types
echo -e "\nChecking for specific tokio-util/stream type usage in rocketmq-store:"
rg "(use|import).*tokio[_-](util|stream)" rocketmq-store/

# Check if rocketmq-store is a dependency of other crates
echo -e "\nChecking if other crates depend on rocketmq-store:"
fd Cargo.toml --type f --exec grep -l "rocketmq-store"

Length of output: 668


Line range hint 1-58: Verify complete dependency cleanup

The AI summary indicates removal of several dependencies (rocketmq-runtime, futures-related, mockall) that should be verified for:

  1. Complete removal of their usage
  2. No remaining dead code
  3. No broken functionality
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more context about the actual usage of these dependencies in the store module to verify if they are properly cleaned up.


Dependencies have been properly cleaned up in the store module

The verification shows that the rocketmq-store module has been properly cleaned up with no remaining traces of the removed dependencies (futures-related, rocketmq-runtime, and mockall). While these dependencies are still used in other parts of the codebase, they have been completely removed from the store module, indicating a successful cleanup with no dead code or broken functionality related to these dependencies.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify complete cleanup of removed dependencies

# Check for any remaining imports of removed dependencies
echo "Checking for remaining usage of removed dependencies:"

# Check for futures-related imports
echo "Checking futures usage:"
rg -l "use futures" 

# Check for rocketmq-runtime usage
echo "Checking rocketmq-runtime usage:"
rg -l "rocketmq_runtime"

# Check for mockall usage in tests
echo "Checking mockall usage:"
rg -l "use mockall"

Length of output: 1332


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining code that might be using these dependencies in the store module
echo "Checking store module for any remaining usage:"

# Check for futures usage in store
echo "Checking futures usage in store:"
rg "futures" rocketmq-store/ -C 2

# Check for rocketmq-runtime usage in store
echo "Checking rocketmq-runtime usage in store:"
rg "rocketmq_runtime" rocketmq-store/ -C 2

# Check for mockall usage in store
echo "Checking mockall usage in store:"
rg "mockall" rocketmq-store/ -C 2

# Check for any test files that might still use mockall
echo "Checking test files in store:"
fd "test" rocketmq-store/ --type f --exec rg "mock" {} -C 2

Length of output: 585


48-48: Verify sysinfo version downgrade impact

The downgrade from sysinfo 0.32.1 to 0.32.0 requires verification of compatibility and understanding the motivation for this change.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the actual usage of sysinfo in the codebase to understand the impact better.


Downgrade from sysinfo 0.32.1 to 0.32.0 is safe

The codebase uses only stable APIs from sysinfo:

  • System::new_all(), refresh_all(), and total_memory() for memory information
  • Disks::new_with_refreshed_list(), mount_point(), total_space(), and available_space() for disk information

These are core features that have been stable across 0.32.x versions and the minor version downgrade won't impact functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes between sysinfo versions

# Check the changelog for breaking changes
echo "Fetching sysinfo changelog between versions:"
gh api repos/guillaumegomez/sysinfo/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("0.32")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}'

# Search for sysinfo usage patterns that might be affected
echo "Checking sysinfo usage patterns:"
rg "sysinfo::" -A 3

Length of output: 952


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check specific usage of sysinfo in the files
echo "Checking StoreUtil implementation:"
rg -A 10 "impl StoreUtil" rocketmq-store/src/utils/store_util.rs

echo -e "\nChecking broker config handler implementation:"
rg -A 10 "Disks" rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/broker_config_request_handler.rs

# Check if there are any version-specific features or methods being used
echo -e "\nChecking for System usage:"
rg "System::" -A 2 rocketmq-store/src/utils/store_util.rs

echo -e "\nChecking for Disks usage:"
rg "Disks::" -A 2 rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/broker_config_request_handler.rs

Length of output: 2052


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added this to the v0.4.0 milestone Nov 28, 2024
@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

@RocketmqRustBot RocketmqRustBot added the enhancement⚡️ New feature or request label Nov 28, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.29%. Comparing base (83ff7de) to head (5507f45).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1397   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.29%   21.29%           
=======================================
  Files         442      442           
  Lines       56660    56660           
=======================================
  Hits        12065    12065           
  Misses      44595    44595           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge enhancement⚡️ New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Remove unused crate in rocketmq-store
4 participants