-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ISSUE #1396]🔥Remove unused crate in rocketmq-store #1397
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml (3)
The removal of tokio-util and tokio-stream dependencies needs verification to ensure it doesn't impact existing functionality. ✅ Verification successfulRemoval of tokio dependencies is safe The removal of tokio-util and tokio-stream dependencies from rocketmq-store/Cargo.toml is safe because:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining usage of removed tokio dependencies
# Search for tokio-util usage
echo "Checking for tokio-util usage:"
rg -l "tokio[_-]util"
# Search for tokio-stream usage
echo "Checking for tokio-stream usage:"
rg -l "tokio[_-]stream"
Length of output: 599 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if rocketmq-store has any direct usage of tokio-util or tokio-stream
echo "Checking rocketmq-store directory for tokio dependencies usage:"
rg -l "tokio[_-](util|stream)" rocketmq-store/
# Check if rocketmq-store has any imports or uses of tokio-util or tokio-stream types
echo -e "\nChecking for specific tokio-util/stream type usage in rocketmq-store:"
rg "(use|import).*tokio[_-](util|stream)" rocketmq-store/
# Check if rocketmq-store is a dependency of other crates
echo -e "\nChecking if other crates depend on rocketmq-store:"
fd Cargo.toml --type f --exec grep -l "rocketmq-store"
Length of output: 668 Line range hint The AI summary indicates removal of several dependencies (rocketmq-runtime, futures-related, mockall) that should be verified for:
✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more context about the actual usage of these dependencies in the store module to verify if they are properly cleaned up. Dependencies have been properly cleaned up in the store module The verification shows that the rocketmq-store module has been properly cleaned up with no remaining traces of the removed dependencies (futures-related, rocketmq-runtime, and mockall). While these dependencies are still used in other parts of the codebase, they have been completely removed from the store module, indicating a successful cleanup with no dead code or broken functionality related to these dependencies. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify complete cleanup of removed dependencies
# Check for any remaining imports of removed dependencies
echo "Checking for remaining usage of removed dependencies:"
# Check for futures-related imports
echo "Checking futures usage:"
rg -l "use futures"
# Check for rocketmq-runtime usage
echo "Checking rocketmq-runtime usage:"
rg -l "rocketmq_runtime"
# Check for mockall usage in tests
echo "Checking mockall usage:"
rg -l "use mockall"
Length of output: 1332 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining code that might be using these dependencies in the store module
echo "Checking store module for any remaining usage:"
# Check for futures usage in store
echo "Checking futures usage in store:"
rg "futures" rocketmq-store/ -C 2
# Check for rocketmq-runtime usage in store
echo "Checking rocketmq-runtime usage in store:"
rg "rocketmq_runtime" rocketmq-store/ -C 2
# Check for mockall usage in store
echo "Checking mockall usage in store:"
rg "mockall" rocketmq-store/ -C 2
# Check for any test files that might still use mockall
echo "Checking test files in store:"
fd "test" rocketmq-store/ --type f --exec rg "mock" {} -C 2
Length of output: 585
The downgrade from sysinfo 0.32.1 to 0.32.0 requires verification of compatibility and understanding the motivation for this change. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the actual usage of sysinfo in the codebase to understand the impact better. Downgrade from sysinfo 0.32.1 to 0.32.0 is safe The codebase uses only stable APIs from sysinfo:
These are core features that have been stable across 0.32.x versions and the minor version downgrade won't impact functionality. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes between sysinfo versions
# Check the changelog for breaking changes
echo "Fetching sysinfo changelog between versions:"
gh api repos/guillaumegomez/sysinfo/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("0.32")) | {version: .tag_name, body: .body}'
# Search for sysinfo usage patterns that might be affected
echo "Checking sysinfo usage patterns:"
rg "sysinfo::" -A 3
Length of output: 952 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check specific usage of sysinfo in the files
echo "Checking StoreUtil implementation:"
rg -A 10 "impl StoreUtil" rocketmq-store/src/utils/store_util.rs
echo -e "\nChecking broker config handler implementation:"
rg -A 10 "Disks" rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/broker_config_request_handler.rs
# Check if there are any version-specific features or methods being used
echo -e "\nChecking for System usage:"
rg "System::" -A 2 rocketmq-store/src/utils/store_util.rs
echo -e "\nChecking for Disks usage:"
rg "Disks::" -A 2 rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/broker_config_request_handler.rs
Length of output: 2052 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1397 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 21.29% 21.29%
=======================================
Files 442 442
Lines 56660 56660
=======================================
Hits 12065 12065
Misses 44595 44595 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1396
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
sysinfo
dependency version for compatibility.