Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

txt2man is partially incompatible with gawk 5.0.1 #21

Closed
eribertomota opened this issue Nov 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

txt2man is partially incompatible with gawk 5.0.1 #21

eribertomota opened this issue Nov 18, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@eribertomota
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mvertes,

gawk 5.0.1 was uploaded to Debian on 2019-11-03[1]. Since this date, the Debian CI failed to test txt2man[2][3]. See here a small test:

$ cat test.txt 
NAME
  test - do a test
DESCRIPTION
  Do a test.
$ txt2man test.txt > /dev/null
gawk: cmd. line:58: warning: regexp escape sequence `\o' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:116: warning: regexp escape sequence `\,' is not a known regexp operator
gawk: cmd. line:116: warning: regexp escape sequence `\;' is not a known regexp operator

I found here[4] a tip about how to fix this issue.

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/gawk
[2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/t/txt2man/unstable/amd64/
[3] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/t/txt2man/3329134/log.gz
[4] KittyKatt/screenFetch#627 (comment)

Cheers,

Eriberto

@eribertomota
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hum... I saw now that #18 seems solve the issue...

ldorau added a commit to ldorau/rpma that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
ldorau added a commit to ldorau/rpma that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
ldorau added a commit to ldorau/rpma that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
ldorau added a commit to ldorau/rpma that referenced this issue May 29, 2020
ldorau added a commit to ldorau/rpma that referenced this issue Jun 1, 2020
@mvertes
Copy link
Owner

mvertes commented Jun 4, 2020

fixed by #55

@mvertes mvertes closed this as completed Jun 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants