Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Releasing a new version #79

Closed
zesterer opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 10 comments
Closed

Releasing a new version #79

zesterer opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 10 comments

Comments

@zesterer
Copy link
Collaborator

zesterer commented Oct 7, 2020

Several PRs were merged recently that add a significant number of features to the crate. A new version for crates.io would be welcome.

@mvdnes
Copy link
Owner

mvdnes commented Oct 7, 2020

Sure. Do you want to publish 0.5.3 or 0.6.0?

@zesterer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zesterer commented Oct 7, 2020

0.6.0. Although I don't think that any changes are actually breaking, adding support for lock_api and changing up the internals quite a bit calls for a new minor version in my view. If it's easier for you, I'm happy to handle the release (I'll need permission on crates.io, of course).

@mvdnes
Copy link
Owner

mvdnes commented Oct 8, 2020

Sure, I have sent you an invite.

@zesterer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zesterer commented Oct 8, 2020

Thanks! I'll release the new version in a little while.

Edit: 0.6 is now released!

@ErichDonGubler
Copy link

Does this mean that RUSTSEC-2019-0031, which states this project is unmaintained, is invalid? I've been pinged on a PR I have that resolves that advisory for ring, where the 0.6.0 release was noted.

@zesterer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ErichDonGubler Yes, it's invalid. I files a PR to update this 2 days ago. It was merged, but it seems there's a bug in cargo-audit that means it still shows up. Hopefully this will be fixed soon.

@zesterer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zesterer commented Oct 10, 2020

@mvdnes If you happen to have the time, I'd much appreciate a change of the repo description to Spin-based synchronization primitives since I don't seem to have permission to change it. Cheers!

@mvdnes
Copy link
Owner

mvdnes commented Oct 10, 2020

👍 Done

@djc
Copy link

djc commented Oct 17, 2020

It was merged, but it seems there's a bug in cargo-audit that means it still shows up. Hopefully this will be fixed soon.

Can you link to the bug? I looked for it but haven't found it.

@zesterer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@djc It was discussed on the rust-lang Zulip. this PR should have resolved it though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants