Add the disableDescription flag, which can be used to NOT print a description for a schema, even if it has been defined previously.

[cmaster11]

This can also be useful when dealing with objects with patterns and the unknownType meta. In such cases, the description of the unknownType is propagated to the map entry, creating sometimes a bit of confusion because the description belongs to each map entry's value and not its key.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1a9476b) 98.69% compared to head (e4e8a49) 98.72%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #403      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.69%   98.72%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         537      547      +10     
  Branches      207      209       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          530      540      +10     
  Misses          7        7              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mrjono1]

the test it doesn't seem to be working?

[cmaster11]

the test it doesn't seem to be working?

@mrjono1 The test is working in the sense that it discards the description, but if the commentEverything flag is on, it will still print the field name (see https://github.com/mrjono1/joi-to-typescript/pull/403/files#diff-9e9125afe9cea21b9041b826bc4d11b91fdc99c938f818a1956c6b397ac0bfc3R73 vs https://github.com/mrjono1/joi-to-typescript/pull/403/files#diff-9e9125afe9cea21b9041b826bc4d11b91fdc99c938f818a1956c6b397ac0bfc3R82). Do you think this flag should override the commentEverything one too?

[mrjono1]

yeah I think it should make no jsdoc be produced for this field

[cmaster11]

@mrjono1 what if instead of ignoreDescription I use disableDescription? I think that would be more descriptive of the effect then.