Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix simple typo: shat -> that #196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2020
Merged

Fix simple typo: shat -> that #196

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 29, 2020

Conversation

timgates42
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #195

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #196 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #196   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          26     26           
  Lines         665    665           
  Branches      112    112           
=====================================
  Hits          665    665

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 67f41d5...5ed9bc0. Read the comment docs.

@mozillazg
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

@mozillazg mozillazg merged commit d6d1121 into mozillazg:master Feb 29, 2020
luzpaz pushed a commit to codespell-project/codespell that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2021
…ictionary

A lot of repositories contain this typo which was introduced by a bug in
a sphinx-doc template which has since been fixed. Add correction to rare dictionary.

Examples:
* mozillazg/python-pinyin#196
* jazzband/django-permission#84
* philippbosch/django-geoposition#113
* revsys/django-test-plus#117
* danjac/pyramid_storage#38
* https://github.com/tetframework/Tonnikala/pull/7`
* duerrp/pyexperiment#2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix simple typo: shat -> that
2 participants