-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Editor] Add a floating button close to the selected text to highlight it (bug 1867742) #17732
[Editor] Add a floating button close to the selected text to highlight it (bug 1867742) #17732
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Leaving a couple of comments based on a very brief look.
Also, on a personal level, I'm finding this new feature quite annoying since the button feels "in the way" whenever I just want to select a piece of text; do we really "need" to add this?
For me bug 1868753 is a lot less "invasive", although it's obviously less discoverable.
All other editing features are simply toolbar buttons that can be easily ignored, but this feature will get "in your face" a lot more. (For me, if this feature is enabled unconditionally, I'd probably run Firefox with pdfjs.annotationEditorMode = -1
set.)
This is why we want to put it behind a pref and run an experiment to see how average users like it. |
Will that actually tell if users "like" the feature (since it seems to me that'd essentially require interviewing people and asking them), or will it simply be measuring usage? |
UX did interview people and they seemed to like the feature, but we want to make sure there are only positive and no adverse effects on usage metrics (how frequently people read PDFs, how frequently people set Firefox as default PDF reader, and so on). |
317e60c
to
513c331
Compare
e199bad
to
5426f51
Compare
5426f51
to
aa0b861
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
r=me, under "protest" :-)
While the implementation obviously seems fine, I'm finding the actual feature itself annoying and wish that we won't force this behaviour unconditionally on users.
/botio integrationtest |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @calixteman received. Current queue size: 1 Live output at: http://54.193.163.58:8877/1277aa8cf30b364/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @calixteman received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.241.84.105:8877/4168f94d6c6080f/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)FailedFull output at http://54.241.84.105:8877/4168f94d6c6080f/output.txt Total script time: 6.41 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://54.193.163.58:8877/1277aa8cf30b364/output.txt Total script time: 15.43 mins
|
…t it (bug 1867742) For now keep this feature behind a pref in order to make some experiments before deciding to enable it.
aa0b861
to
b4267cd
Compare
/botio integrationtest |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @calixteman received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.241.84.105:8877/4b5da38e064d3e5/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @calixteman received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.193.163.58:8877/6fefb183160b396/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)SuccessFull output at http://54.241.84.105:8877/4b5da38e064d3e5/output.txt Total script time: 6.47 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://54.193.163.58:8877/6fefb183160b396/output.txt Total script time: 19.08 mins
|
For now keep this feature behind a pref in order to make some experiments before deciding to enable it.