-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Handle appending consistently in the xfaLayer regardless of rendering intent (PR 17177 follow-up) #17184
Handle appending consistently in the xfaLayer regardless of rendering intent (PR 17177 follow-up) #17184
Conversation
… intent (PR 17177 follow-up) After PR 17177 the interface of `XfaLayerBuilder` is now inconsistent, since whether or not we directly append the xfaLayer to the DOM now depends on the rendering intent.
/botio-linux preview |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_preview from @Snuffleupagus received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.241.84.105:8877/e9981da1372d157/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)SuccessFull output at http://54.241.84.105:8877/e9981da1372d157/output.txt Total script time: 1.48 mins Published |
/botio integrationtest |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @Snuffleupagus received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.241.84.105:8877/55a2e58432e897f/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_integrationtest from @Snuffleupagus received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.193.163.58:8877/41997b1364937e8/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)SuccessFull output at http://54.241.84.105:8877/55a2e58432e897f/output.txt Total script time: 5.51 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://54.193.163.58:8877/41997b1364937e8/output.txt Total script time: 17.96 mins
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me, but I'd like Calixte to also sign off on this given that he did reviewed the original patch. Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thank you.
After PR #17177 the interface of
XfaLayerBuilder
is now inconsistent, since whether or not we directly append the xfaLayer to the DOM now depends on the rendering intent.