-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add PDFs from #1773 to the reftests #13616
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are both of these new test-cases actually checking specific things not already covered by existing tests?
734ce62
to
810dfd4
Compare
There is no easy way to tell without code coverage information, but since we still have relatively few reftests for XFA, I'm inclined to think these are likely to cover at least something that isn't already covered. |
And layout stuff is pretty touchy so having more reftests will help to avoid future layout regressions. |
/botio makeref |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)ReceivedCommand cmd_makeref from @calixteman received. Current queue size: 0 Live output at: http://54.67.70.0:8877/eae917b573338d2/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Windows)ReceivedCommand cmd_makeref from @calixteman received. Current queue size: 1 Live output at: http://3.101.106.178:8877/8d5486593d2a0cb/output.txt |
From: Bot.io (Linux m4)SuccessFull output at http://54.67.70.0:8877/eae917b573338d2/output.txt Total script time: 26.36 mins
|
From: Bot.io (Windows)SuccessFull output at http://3.101.106.178:8877/8d5486593d2a0cb/output.txt Total script time: 31.44 mins
|
No description provided.