Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

set RRT as default planner #41

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2016
Merged

Conversation

k-okada
Copy link
Contributor

@k-okada k-okada commented Feb 7, 2016

set default planning config, which is supported on moveit 0.7
moveit/moveit_ros#625

set default planning config, which is supported on moveit 0.7
moveit/moveit_ros#625
@rethink-imcmahon
Copy link

This is very interesting! If no planner was specified before, what would MoveIt default to? Was it RRTConnect? I would like to keep the functionality the same, if possible.

@k-okada
Copy link
Contributor Author

k-okada commented Feb 9, 2016

Currently, they use LBKPIECE as a default planner and it tend to generate
redundant path or sometimes it failed to find solution, whereas rrt gives
better solution.
I haven't choose RRT just because I'm familiar with that, did not compared
with other algorithms.

◉ Kei Okada

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Ian McMahon [email protected]
wrote:

This is very interesting! If no planner was specified before, what would
MoveIt default to? Was it RRTConnect? I would like to keep the
functionality the same, if possible.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#41 (comment)
.

@rethink-imcmahon
Copy link

That rational sounds good to me. I happen to use RRTConnect in a lot of my testing for exactly that reason.

rethink-imcmahon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2016
set RRT as default planner
@rethink-imcmahon rethink-imcmahon merged commit 2ed4970 into moveit:master Feb 9, 2016
@rethink-imcmahon
Copy link

Thanks for the contribution @k-okada!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants