Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl. #980

Merged
merged 137 commits into from
Jun 23, 2023

Conversation

kameshsr
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

kameshsr and others added 30 commits December 13, 2022 10:57
kameshsr and others added 26 commits June 1, 2023 12:16
@loganathan-sekaran loganathan-sekaran merged commit d153996 into mosip:develop Jun 23, 2023
kameshsr added a commit to kameshsr/resident-services that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2023
)

* Fixed service history issue.

* MOSIP-27716 Moved identity-data-formatter.mvel to credentialdata.mvel.

* Fixed Null pointer exception in notification method.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

Signed-off-by: kameshsr <[email protected]>
RitikJain4108 pushed a commit to RitikJain4108/resident-services that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2023
)

* Fixed service history issue.

* MOSIP-27716 Moved identity-data-formatter.mvel to credentialdata.mvel.

* Fixed Null pointer exception in notification method.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

* MOSIP-24939 Improved code coverage of ResidentVidServiceImpl.

Signed-off-by: Ritik Jain <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants