Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump Redis to version 5 #130

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024
Merged

Bump Redis to version 5 #130

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

HuongNV13
Copy link
Contributor

MDL-66151 required Redis 5.0.0. We need to bump Redis from 3 to 5

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 63.84%. Comparing base (8c451a0) to head (648ac88).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #130      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   57.15%   63.84%   +6.69%     
==========================================
  Files          47       47              
  Lines        1643     1643              
==========================================
+ Hits          939     1049     +110     
+ Misses        704      594     -110     
Flag Coverage Δ
behat_bisect_test 40.41% <ø> (ø)
behat_test 40.17% <ø> (?)
phpunit_bisect_test 34.87% <ø> (ø)
phpunit_test 34.93% <ø> (ø)
postjobs_test 33.57% <ø> (ø)
runner_test 16.25% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@lameze
Copy link
Contributor

lameze commented Sep 3, 2024

LGTM

@lameze lameze merged commit a2fa45a into moodlehq:main Sep 3, 2024
14 checks passed
@HuongNV13 HuongNV13 deleted the bumpredis branch September 3, 2024 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants