Skip to content
Ongy edited this page Jul 2, 2017 · 3 revisions

Comparing monky performance to other applications

I did a quick comparison of monky with some other similar applications here. This includes:

  • monky + ongybar
  • xmobar
  • i3status/i3bar
  • conky Not included:
  • monky + dzen

What I found out:

i3status + i3bar are surprisingly fast. They currently beat everything. Either for performance or for feature completenes. The downside being, that i3bar only works inside the i3wm and i3status having a rather special monitor set based on developer opinions.

Conky and xmobar are in the same category in speed. Conky has a slightly different goal compared to the other projects here though.

monky + ongybar performs on par with i3status+i3bar currently. The current way is going over dzen syntax, which is parsed in parts by the ongybar. I will redo the tests when I have proper binary protocol set up.

Screenshots from powertop:

Legend:

  • i3bar/i3status is green
  • monky/ongybar is red
  • Conky/xmobar blue (though I have forgot to mark conky in one of them) powertop screen 1 powertop screen 2

Why I excluded dzen:

It's horrible. That's why. (it's embarrassingly bad if viewed in powertop. I don't want to admit to what I have been running).