-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 178
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
IP allowlist range force replacement on 1.12.0 #1495
Comments
Thanks for opening this issue. The ticket INTMDB-1138 was created for internal tracking. |
ps - I was able to get it to plan cleanly with both old and new provider by doing a That seems to work, though if I plan the state that was applied w/ 1.12.0, I now get an error if I apply with the previous version again:
|
Hi @wyardley Is it possible to share the original state of one of these affected resources from the statefile so we could try to compare for ourselves? |
Hi - thanks. I don't believe I have that version of the state accessible easily -- sorry. |
No worries, we will try to reproduce this on our end. |
Hey there, I'm running into this as well. If it helps in your repro, my current state (some values
here's my module definition:
and here's what the
FWIW I figured it wouldn't matter but I also tried explicitly setting Just wanted to drop this here if it helps, I'll probably also be doing a |
Hi @cah6 could you please share the previous version of the provider you used to create these resources before upgrading to 1.12.0? I have tried reproducing this but unsuccessful so far. Here are the steps I tried:
Could you please help identifying what might be missing here? |
@maastha these resources were originally created with version 1.8.0, although I believe that when we upgraded to 1.11.1, it successfully planned without needing replacements. |
FWIW, we've been using the provider since 1.3.1 or before; we pin it, and typically update one version at a time when prompted by Renovate. |
I’ve already done the workaround above, so don’t have any of that accessible to me. the step was just to plan or apply, though. |
Yeah, sorry I also already fixed to get past this locally, so can't give the broken tfstate file. I don't think there were any other logs or steps other than planning/applying. |
I ran with |
@cah6 are you able to share what you had to do to fix this locally? |
This issue has gone 7 days without any activity and meets the project’s definition of "stale". This will be auto-closed if there is no new activity over the next 7 days. If the issue is still relevant and active, you can simply comment with a "bump" to keep it open, or add the label "not_stale". Thanks for keeping our repository healthy! |
I'm assuming they did the same thing I did - remove the resource, and re-import it. |
Hi |
Terraform CLI and Terraform MongoDB Atlas Provider Version
Terraform Configuration File
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Behavior
No change / drift
Actual Behavior
Debug Output
Crash Output
Additional Context
aws_security_group
bit, whether that's a red herring or relevant.References
Not sure if this could be related to #1493 somehow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: