Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: added migration step to migrate keytar secrets to vscode SecretStorage - VSCODE-435 #552
chore: added migration step to migrate keytar secrets to vscode SecretStorage - VSCODE-435 #552
Changes from 2 commits
5f85bb7
7e0e4c7
f624554
dcd2a11
6c67419
eea1fcc
2970158
b83d44b
0742e4b
cdd9018
e6ea5bf
1249543
36e17c0
808e60e
4250dd6
ee19bb1
8cca2be
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could it be just
export type SecretStorageLocationType = 'vscode.Keytar' | 'vscode.SecretStorage';
? Do we need at all SecretStorageLocation? cc @addaleaxThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea I think it could be. I probably did it this way just so I also have a string const to use in places where the types are not available from the context (for example tests and a couple other places in the code as well where we declare a connection info like object with secret storage).