Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pass: de-prioritize base pointer in register allocation #184

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 19, 2021

Conversation

mmcloughlin
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 19, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #184 (94bf0fa) into master (f295bde) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #184   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   79.50%   79.50%           
=======================================
  Files          56       56           
  Lines       30919    30922    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits        24581    24584    +3     
  Misses       6192     6192           
  Partials      146      146           
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 7.45% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests 77.67% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pass/reg.go 83.05% <100.00%> (+0.90%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f295bde...94bf0fa. Read the comment docs.

@mmcloughlin mmcloughlin changed the title pass: de-prioritize base pointer pass: de-prioritize base pointer in register allocation Apr 19, 2021
@mmcloughlin mmcloughlin merged commit c32f24f into master Apr 19, 2021
@mmcloughlin mmcloughlin deleted the deprioritize-frame-pointer branch April 19, 2021 21:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants