Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expanded functionality for regr.h2o.gbm #2508

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Feb 25, 2019
Merged

Expanded functionality for regr.h2o.gbm #2508

merged 17 commits into from
Feb 25, 2019

Conversation

j-hartshorn
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request implements the suggestions in #2208 for regr.h2o.gbm and elaborates on the available parameters.

In particular, it removes the decision to hard code distribution = "gaussian" from the learner and allows the use of others.

@larskotthoff
Copy link
Member

Thanks, looks good. Could you add a few of those new parameters in the test please so that they're checked automatically?

@j-hartshorn
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, looks good. Could you add a few of those new parameters in the test please so that they're checked automatically?

Added!

I'm not sure what I can do about the appveyor build failing, any suggestions?

@pat-s
Copy link
Member

pat-s commented Feb 1, 2019

Appveyor build is not stable atm, merging a PR soon. Just ignore if for now.

@pat-s
Copy link
Member

pat-s commented Feb 20, 2019

Will take a closer look in the next days, please ping if not ;)

@pat-s pat-s merged commit f807f99 into mlr-org:master Feb 25, 2019
pat-s added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2019
vrodriguezf pushed a commit to vrodriguezf/mlr that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2021
This pull request implements the suggestions in mlr-org#2208 for `regr.h2o.gbm` and elaborates on the available parameters.

In particular, it removes the decision to hard code `distribution = "gaussian"` from the learner and allows the use of others.

<!---
We are always happy to receive pull requests.

Please make sure you have read our coding guidelines: 
https://github.com/mlr-org/mlr/wiki/mlr-Coding-Guidelines

This especially means that you have understood:

* The style guide - our lintr will provide you feedback on this
* How to run tests locally. Yes, travis will also run them for you, bad it is annoying to wait for this.
* How to run R CMD CHECK locally. See point before. 

Also it's helpful to get into direct contact with the suggested reviewers to get help, getting your PR merged.
You might want to join our slack at: 
https://mlr-org.slack.com
--->
vrodriguezf pushed a commit to vrodriguezf/mlr that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants