Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix attribute keyword typo in save function #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

joeloskarsson
Copy link
Contributor

@joeloskarsson joeloskarsson commented Nov 4, 2024

Describe your changes

When the wmg.save.to_pyg function is used with the list_from_attribute argument it gives the error:

TypeError: split_graph_by_edge_attribute() got an unexpected keyword argument 'attribute'

This is due to a typo where attribute / attr is mixed up when calling split_graph_by_edge_attribute. This PR fixes this bug and adds a test to make sure saving works with this argument.

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • ✨ New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 💥 Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • 📖 Documentation (Addition or improvements to documentation)

Checklist before requesting a review

  • My branch is up-to-date with the target branch - if not update your fork with the changes from the target branch (use pull with --rebase option if possible).
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • For any new/modified functions/classes I have added docstrings that clearly describe its purpose, expected inputs and returned values
  • I have placed in-line comments to clarify the intent of any hard-to-understand passages of my code
  • I have updated the documentation to cover introduced code changes
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have given the PR a name that clearly describes the change, written in imperative form (context).
  • I have requested a reviewer and an assignee (assignee is responsible for merging)

Checklist for reviewers

Each PR comes with its own improvements and flaws. The reviewer should check the following:

  • the code is readable
  • the code is well tested
  • the code is documented (including return types and parameters)
  • the code is easy to maintain

Author checklist after completed review

  • I have added a line to the CHANGELOG describing this change, in a section
    reflecting type of change (add section where missing):
    • added: when you have added new functionality
    • changed: when default behaviour of the code has been changed
    • fixes: when your contribution fixes a bug

Checklist for assignee

  • PR is up to date with the base branch
  • the tests pass
  • author has added an entry to the changelog (and designated the change as added, changed or fixed)
  • Once the PR is ready to be merged, squash commits and merge the PR.

@joeloskarsson joeloskarsson self-assigned this Nov 4, 2024
@joeloskarsson joeloskarsson added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@sadamov sadamov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this, ready to merge from my side.

@joeloskarsson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since this is just a bugfix I'll go ahead and merge it

@joeloskarsson joeloskarsson merged commit 3378faa into mllam:main Nov 11, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants