Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Boost to 1.70, fix inefficient connection handling #6

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mjjbell
Copy link
Owner

@mjjbell mjjbell commented Aug 24, 2021

Issue

A request to osrm-routed can be assigned to a thread which
is currently busy processing another request, even when there
are other threads/cores available. This unnecessarily delays
the response, and can make requests appear to hang when
awaiting CPU intensive requests to finish.

The issue looks like a bug in Boost.Asio multithreaded
networking stack.

osrm-routed server implementation is
heavily influenced by the HTTP server 3 example in the
Boost.Asio docs. By upgrading to Boost 1.70 and updating the
server connections to match the example provided in the 1.70
release, the problem is resolved.

The diff of the changes to the Boost.Asio stack are
vast, so it's difficult to identify the exact cause. However
the implementation change is to push the strand of execution
into the socket (and timer) objects, which suggests it could
fix the type of threading issue we are observing.

Tasklist

Requirements / Relations

Link any requirements here. Other pull requests this PR is based on?

A request to osrm-routed can be assigned to a thread which
is currently busy processing another request, even when there
are other threads/cores available. This unnecessarily delays
the response, and can make requests appear to hang when
awaiting CPU intensive requests to finish.

The issue looks like a bug in Boost.Asio multithreaded
networking stack.

osrm-routed server implementation is
heavily influenced by the HTTP server 3 example in the
Boost.Asio docs. By upgrading to Boost 1.70 and updating the
server connections to match the example provided in the 1.70
release, the problem is resolved.

The diff of the changes to the Boost.Asio stack are
vast, so it's difficult to identify the exact cause. However
the implementation change is to push the strand of execution
into the socket (and timer) objects, which suggests it could
fix the type of threading issue we are observing.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant