forked from cms-sw/cmssw
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From cmssw 6 2 x slhc 2014 06 04 0200 #2
Closed
dildick
wants to merge
27
commits into
mileva:neutralBkg_forME0_2Jun
from
dildick:from-CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC_2014-06-04-0200
Closed
From cmssw 6 2 x slhc 2014 06 04 0200 #2
dildick
wants to merge
27
commits into
mileva:neutralBkg_forME0_2Jun
from
dildick:from-CMSSW_6_2_X_SLHC_2014-06-04-0200
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Neutron backgound: backport from 7_1_X
Fixed missing line in duplication removal
Phase2 shk24
Phase2 shk23
mileva
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2014
mileva
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 15, 2014
mileva
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2014
…om-EP-Muons-80e3a78 L1MuonParticleExtended with its producer and L1TkMus made with it
mileva
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2017
CMSSW GCC 7.0.1 builds now follows jemalloc (dev branch) and also has a new TCMalloc. Both of these have C++14 sized deallocation feature enabled. This means that if possible operator delete will be called with size argument, which will help allocator to reduce the time to free the object. E.g. this is not possible for incomplete types which size is unknown at a time. GCC 7.0.1 builds contain an additional build of jemalloc (jemalloc-debug) which contains extra asserts and checks for developers. This seems to be undefined behavior in C++14. From [expr.delete] (5.3.5 Delete): In the first alternative (delete object), if the static type of the object to be deleted is different from its dynamic type, the static type shall be a base class of the dynamic type of the object to be deleted and the static type shall have a virtual destructor or the behavior is undefined. Signed-off-by: David Abdurachmanov <[email protected]>
mileva
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.